Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An immaculate conception?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:54 PM
Original message
An immaculate conception?

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/994/op3.htm

The Palestinian Authority is pregnant! Indeed, it is the unelected and American-imposed Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad who is pregnant. He told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in a recent interview that "the time for this baby to be born will come... and we estimate it will come around 2011." Unlike females of the human species but like female whales, the gestation period for male Palestinian collaborators with the Israeli occupation extends at least to two years. Fayyad, "the Palestinian Ben- Gurion," as Shimon Peres recently dubbed him, had declared his pregnancy in a document he issued on 25 August 2009 titled Palestine: Ending the Occupation and Establishing the State, and more recently to Haaretz : "the birth of a Palestinian state will be celebrated as a day of joy by the entire community of nations."

We seem to already know the name, weight, ideological colour, and the physical make-up of this "baby;" nay we even know the political structure, and the foreign policy of the fruit of Fayyad's womb: a tiny Palestinian "state" that recognises Israel as a "biblical" Jewish state. The time of birth will be determined by Fayyad as both mother and midwife. While the last immaculate conception that took place in Palestine was in Nazareth, it remains unclear if what is unfolding in Ramallah is a second immaculate conception, as no paternity tests have been scheduled as of yet for this illegitimate baby. Given the longstanding affairs that Fayyad has had with the Americans since his stint at the International Monetary Fund from 1995 to 2002, some heretics reject the theory of immaculate conception and claim to know the identity of the father and point to Fayyad's words as evidence. According to Haaretz, Fayyad is planning to induce labour in August 2011 in order "for the state to be born during the first term of Barack Obama", the most likely father according to the heretics. Non- Cuban cigars will be on hand for immediate distribution to the friends and family of the happy couple. It should be noted that while Fayyad's declaration of his two-year pregnancy was made in August 2009, belated congratulations finally arrived from the European Union and the Quartet in December 2009.

But as many previous pregnancies by other Palestinian male collaborators turned out, to the chagrin of many, to be hysterical pregnancies, or, in case they were real pregnancies were terminated prematurely, before Fayyad's baby is born, several steps will have to be taken in order to ensure that this "real" pregnancy be carried full term:

read on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this again, PM... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, the fact that it is in a newspaper makes all the difference in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with his POV completely.
Can someone tell me what all the fuss is about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Op is set with truth and no "truthiness"....lol That can be hard for some to take.
Thanks for posting btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What's the fuss all about? You mean besides holding to a warmongering maximalist position
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 07:31 PM by shira
...that guarantees another 62 years of misery and resistance for stateless Palestinians?

:eyes:

Neither the Clinton Parameters or the Geneva Initiative come close to meeting these extreme expectations that simply will not allow for Israel to remain intact and secure.

It's the same position of Arab extremists in 1948.

It's no wonder Ray Hanania is frowned upon by some here. He's WAY too liberal/progressive for these FAR rightwingers who write for EI. For that matter so are Jimmy Carter and Noam Chomsky, who think the Geneva Initiative is fair. Massad and his gang believe something like the GI is nothing short of treasonous capitulation.

Even if Obama manages to get Israel to pull back exactly to 1948 borders, accept 500,000 refugees, and drop recognition of a Jewish state as a condition, Obama would be seen as a betrayor and Zionist Imperialist who caved and didn't do enough to guarantee Israel's destruction.

This is nothing but a sick, warmongering position that does nothing for the welfare of Palestinians in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You're nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. "the Palestinian Ben- Gurion"
Boy, you just don't know where to start.
:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't know what the answer is, but I do know the answer ISN'T this.
Time to stop the process, take a break, and assess internally on both sides!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Massad has legitimate concerns, he may be dramatizing with the immaculate
conception line, but valid concerns nonetheless, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. ITA. That silly language is not very helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC