Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DEMOCRACY NOW: PlaywrightTony Kushner Speaks Out on CUNY Controversy, Academic Freedom and Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:44 AM
Original message
DEMOCRACY NOW: PlaywrightTony Kushner Speaks Out on CUNY Controversy, Academic Freedom and Israel
Edited on Wed May-11-11 11:45 AM by Douglas Carpenter


BROADCAST EXCLUSIVE: Playwright Tony Kushner Speaks Out on CUNY Controversy, Academic Freedom and Israel


In a global broadcast exclusive, the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Tony Kushner appears on Democracy Now! to announce he will accept an honorary degree at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, following a controversy that sparked national attention. Last week, the Board of Trustees of the City University of New York voted to shelve the degree after one member cited Kushner’s critical views of Israeli government policies. But on Monday night, the CUNY board reversed its decision. Kushner says he is still hoping for an apology: "In lieu of an apology, I would accept what is clearly an admission of error of judgment and a lapse of responsibility on the part of the board in defending open exchange and academic freedom." Kushner, one of the world’s leading playwrights, has long been a defender of the human rights of Palestinians and a critic of Israeli policies. “It’s impossible to shape a legitimate and successful path towards peace based on rhetoric and demagoguery and fantasy,” Kushner says. His new play, The Intelligent Homosexual’s Guide to Capitalism and Socialism with a Key to the Scriptures , just opened at the Public Theater in New York City.

watch/listen/read transcript:

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/5/10/exclusive_playwright_tony_kushner_speaks_out?utm_source=Mondoweiss+List&utm_campaign=7b120c6ff2-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is interesting to me about this case is not that a person who
holds the opinion of Palestinians as Weisenfeld does would act as he did, but how exactly did he persuade the other trustees.

For me this is the greater concern, as Mr Kushner points out, Weisenfeld's proof he presented here:

Everything that he says is taken out of context. I think it’s really shocking that he says to the board, "I’m not going to bore you with the details," as if the consideration of whether or not somebody is worthy of an honorary degree is not worthy of, you know, being, quote-unquote, "bored with details."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. IMO the Board of Trustee's are the key
Edited on Wed May-11-11 01:58 PM by azurnoir
the same thing with Hastings law school, they do not want controversy or anything that could jeopardize future support for the collage , so they cave, in this case it for now appears to have backfired but I am thinking we have not heard the last of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3.  I do hope there are pointed questions posed to the trustee's.
It could very well be they were looking to avoid controversy but I want to hear
the responses...from each of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The word here is donations
Wiesenfeld is rightly standing his ground but it is becoming apparent that despite the claims that refusing to support an honorary degree to Kushner was somehow a violation of academic freedom, what is really at stake in this controversy is an effort to silence anyone who dares to stand up against attacks on Israel. Though Kushner’s highly ideological plays and other writings are deemed so sacred that any opposition to honoring him is considered beyond the pale, Wiesenfeld’s passionate advocacy is considered so odious that he must be exiled from the university.

But though the leftist faculty may think it is in the catbird seat on this issue with the Times cheering on their effort to make Wiesenfeld a pariah, they need to be careful about getting what they asked for. If Wiesenfeld is somehow forced off the board, this may cost the university far more in potential donations from Jewish supporters than the snub to Kushner would have done.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/05/11/pressure-grows-on-cuny-to-remove-kushner-critic/

IMO the same thing happened at Hastings and these days with state and federal budget tightening donation are are more important thn ever but sadly it leaves collages and universities open to political pressure groups
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, I appreciate that, yet Wiesenfeld is not the pressing problem
CUNY faces right now imo. It's too late for them to try and get him out of there..the trustees
problem is they went along with him...but why? If Wiesenfeld has shown a poor capacity to be
objective, then what does that say for the rest of them?

Mr.Wiesenfeld wrote that he expected no one to vote along with him, yet they did.

Perhaps CUNY may want to look at politicians appointing trustees to begin with and reconsider a different
approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. CUNY Graduate Center Advocate



Snip* To begin with it should be clear to every­one at CUNY by now that the BOT is an inher­ently anti-democratic insti­tu­tion. Com­posed almost exclu­sively of polit­i­cal hacks and cor­po­rate raiders — the great major­ity of whom received their appoint­ments as awards for polit­i­cal loy­alty from Repub­li­can Gov­er­nor George Pataki and bil­lion­aire Mayor Michael Bloomberg — the board does not rep­re­sent the inter­ests of the elec­torate or of any of the university’s core stake­hold­ers. Instead, it rep­re­sents only the needs and ide­o­log­i­cal inter­ests of the right-wing politi­cians who have made most of the appoint­ments. Indeed, a quick sur­vey of the board’s web­site reveals that of the fif­teen cur­rent appointed mem­bers, nine were appointed by Pataki, and four were appointed by Bloomberg. Together, that means that thir­teen of the six­teen vot­ing mem­bers of the board were appointed by just those two. Allow­ing two ide­o­log­i­cally right-wing white men to essen­tially choose the entire gov­ern­ing board of a uni­ver­sity as eco­nom­i­cally and racially diverse as CUNY is an insult to any the­ory of democ­racy and can­not pos­si­bly be good for the insti­tu­tion or the many hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple whom the uni­ver­sity serves.

Per­haps worse than this lack of demo­c­ra­tic rep­re­sen­ta­tion, how­ever, is the fact that the board’s mem­bers sim­ply do not seem to care about the vital­ity or heath of CUNY and do not take their charge seri­ously. Indeed, most of the board mem­bers have lit­tle or no expe­ri­ence teach­ing or work­ing within acad­e­mia, and none of them seem to have any real under­stand­ing or appre­ci­a­tion of the value of the intel­lec­tual work that is done at the uni­ver­sity. Their clear and con­tin­ued neg­li­gence and their utter lack of vision, intel­lec­tual curios­ity, and fore­sight is an insult to all of us who work, study, and teach at CUNY and who do our best to improve the uni­ver­sity on a daily basis. From the sev­eral merely igno­rant, to the many pas­sively and actively apa­thetic, to the few down­right mali­cious and venal, these board mem­bers have dis­played an inor­di­nate lack of lead­er­ship, and as the Kush­ner affair has made plain, are inca­pable of even hold­ing a debate within their own ranks, much less capa­ble of con­sid­er­ing, debat­ing, and act­ing upon the many press­ing issues that impact the future of the university.

The CUNY Board of Trustees is not unique in this regard, how­ever. It turns out — no surprise! — that boards across the coun­try are packed — just like CUNY’s — with polit­i­cally appointed cor­po­rate man­agers, who see the uni­ver­sity as just another kind of cor­po­ra­tion. Indeed, over the last three decades, uni­ver­sity gov­ern­ing boards have played a vital and enabling role in the slow destruc­tion of the Amer­i­can sys­tem of higher edu­ca­tion. Rather than using their polit­i­cal influ­ence and con­nec­tions to fight for the insti­tu­tions which they have been charged to defend, they have instead done what comes nat­u­rally to busi­ness elites and have used their skills to remake their respec­tive uni­ver­si­ties into mod­els of cor­po­rate efficiency.

By simul­ta­ne­ously increas­ing stu­dent tuition and dras­ti­cally reduc­ing the costs of instruc­tion through the use and exploita­tion of low-paid, part-time instruc­tors, these boards have helped their right-wing coun­ter­parts in gov­ern­ment shift the costs of higher edu­ca­tion from the pub­lic back to the indi­vid­ual stu­dents and employ­ees of the uni­ver­si­ties they gov­ern, effec­tively under­min­ing, through this process of pri­va­ti­za­tion, the very prin­ci­ples, and often the very char­ters, of the insti­tu­tions they were tasked to uphold and honor. In part because of these boards, the once great promise of the Amer­i­can uni­ver­sity sys­tem, which made it pos­si­ble for so many under­priv­i­leged and eco­nom­i­cally dis­ad­van­taged Amer­i­cans to bet­ter them­selves through the pur­suit of higher edu­ca­tion, has been reduced to a mere shadow of its orig­i­nal self. From Cal­i­for­nia to New York more and more stu­dents are being priced out of the chance to get a decent edu­ca­tion, even as those who can are forced to take larger classes taught by increas­ingly under­paid and over­worked adjuncts.

Clearly it is time that the stu­dents, fac­ulty, and staff at CUNY, and indeed, at all the nation’s uni­ver­si­ties rec­og­nize that any strug­gle to improve their schools has to include a strat­egy to change the insti­tu­tions that gov­ern them. The stu­dents, fac­ulty, and employ­ees of CUNY should nat­u­rally have a voice in the deci­sions that directly affect their well-being and the future of the uni­ver­sity. Towards this end the CUNY com­mu­nity, includ­ing the Pro­fes­sional Staff Con­gress and the stu­dent and fac­ulty sen­ates, must come together and begin to demand seri­ous and exten­sive reform of the Board of Trustees. Such reform should, no doubt, involve a sig­nif­i­cant amount of dis­cus­sion and debate, but should include at the very least a rad­i­cal increase in the num­ber of stu­dent, fac­ulty, and staff rep­re­sen­ta­tives on the board. As I pro­posed back in Feb­ru­ary of 2010, in addi­tion to the cur­rent sev­en­teen mem­bers of the board, there should be at least one elected fac­ulty mem­ber, one elected staff mem­ber, and one elected stu­dent rep­re­sen­ta­tive from each of the University’s cur­rent sev­en­teen cam­puses. This would sig­nif­i­cantly shift the bal­ance of inter­ests from the politi­cians to the stake­hold­ers, while still allow­ing for a sig­nif­i­cant amount of pub­lic rep­re­sen­ta­tion on the board in the form of some kind of reformed pub­lic appoint­ment sys­tem — per­haps one in which trustees are cho­sen by the state leg­is­la­ture instead of the gov­er­nor and the mayor. Such an expanded, demo­c­ra­tic, and diverse board, rep­re­sent­ing all of the major stake­hold­ers of the uni­ver­sity, as well as the inter­ests of the state tax­pay­ers, would be much bet­ter pre­pared to find intel­li­gent and cre­ative solu­tions to the prob­lems that face the uni­ver­sity while still respect­ing and nur­tur­ing the true pur­suit of intel­lec­tual excel­lence that defines any great university.

in full: http://www.gcadvocate.com/2011/05/democracy-now-reinventing-the-cuny-board-of-trustees/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC