|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 07:55 PM Original message |
Question: Phone Calls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Actually I think the concensus was that cell phones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Also, does this mean you are not a no-planer. I can't remember. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Why does that matter? If the "phone calls" are fake that info should be known . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. It matters because no planers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 10:02 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Have you listened to the phone call from 93 yet? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
41. I'm not going to show you anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. Actually, you're my entertainment here -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Have you listened to what you are calling a "dummied" tape? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Translation for "dummied tapes is a smoking gun " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. No . . . IF the tapes are shown to be "dummied" it would be a smoking gun . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. The planes had cellphones on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bushco of the Gaps. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Bolo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The Moussaoui exhibits included a Flash presentation of the airphone calls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. There are alleged summaries from the M. trial, but no records... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It definitely proves... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. If no one boarded FL 77 , how could calls be made from it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. there was no flight 77 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 11:17 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Tell that to the parents of the kids on the National Geographic field trip. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Yes . . . it was announced by the airline -- United? But got very little attention . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Are you some type of weird prankster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. But they do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 01:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. psssstttt.... don't insult LARED by talking about religious people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:03 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Why would I be insulted? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. A couple of the phone call recording are in that exhibit I linked to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I believe the info was that there was no record of any of these calls. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:29 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. If no phone call from Barbara, then Olsen was involved . . . heavily!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. Not at hand right now . . . but -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Congratulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. So you're saying the airline didn't say the flights weren't scheduled on 9/11. . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 02:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
54. That's correct: They did not say any such thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:44 AM Response to Reply #38 |
56. AA flight schedules at the time showed it wasn't scheduled on 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
71. "The records were doctored" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Are you saying the records WEREN'T doctored? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. One last time, Dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 11:14 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. If you have un-doctored proof that FL 77 was scheduled, show it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. No, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. In other words, you can't refute the fact that FL 77 was not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. nice try, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Typically poor Untruther response, dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Perhaps you should reflect on your own advice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 07:59 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Help the SDUD poster out, Mr. or Ms. Cat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. He doesn't need my help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #83 |
87. I see you're still trying to "shift the burden of proof"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Dude...it's YOUR claim...not mine.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 08:06 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Have you lost your mind, dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 08:32 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. cue spooky music |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-11-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Actually, I could, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 10:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Airphones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 03:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Deleted message |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Really good debate Seger --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. What debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Distraction is not debate, as I pointed out . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. So 175 and 93 were real, correct? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 01:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. But I already did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:07 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. DIstractions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. You know .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:50 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. I should have read all of your new posts before my above posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. You know . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
46. I think Olsen changed his story on the calls -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. 9/11 phone calls from "passengers" were NOT made in planes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Listen to CeeCee Lyle's phone call in that Flash Presentation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. You're dancing like you have a different pair of legs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I don't play games when it comes to 9/11 victims calling their husband and saying goodbye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Your opinion doesn't mean anything here, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woody Box (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
23. UA 93 passengers Tom Burnett, CeeCee Lyles, Marion Britton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Have you listened to the phone call from 93 yet? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
43. As I recall it, the 9/11 Commission didn't do much on the "calls" . . . if anything at all...??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 05:09 AM Response to Reply #43 |
55. At least AA77, a 757, had no seat phones... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:55 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Right. Mrs. Olson called Ted from a cell phone while inside the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
59. Keep in mind also that two of the planes supposed didn't have airphones . ..!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. D&P thinks the BTS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 03:32 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. That`s uninteresting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-09-09 06:04 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. BTS is even better... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-09-09 06:30 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. can you think of why american airlines would have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-09-09 08:50 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Simple. Because the flights weren't scheduled. Can YOU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 04:31 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. There is only one logical answer to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. "There is only one logical answer to this" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:16 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. What you wrote is totally ILLogical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:28 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Look, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. The facts do not support your claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 11:00 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. When you can produce a schedule for that day (which would actually DISPROVE your goofy claim)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-23-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #68 |
89. Typical CT answer... no facts, just subjunctively speculations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kesha (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-24-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. HOP HOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NowHearThis (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Minor details that can be covered with a lie repeated over & over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 05:26 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. trained ventriloquists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-28-09 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
91. There's some very definite info that TWO of the planes didn't have airphones . . .!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC