|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Jester_11218 (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 11:35 AM Original message |
Why Americans Refuse to Believe the 9/11 Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Slit Skirt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. it is too ugly of a reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bronco2121 (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 06:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
134. age is important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. BushCo did an excellent marketing of the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. its not something that anyone wants to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushwick Bill (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. Keep up the great work, Jesse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester_11218 (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 03:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veracity (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. America's official bird: the ostrich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. If no believes,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdtroit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. The MSM? Surely you jest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester_11218 (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 04:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I saw and still don't believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
75. As I've said before.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 01:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
130. "Demand Imposible Proofs" is disinfo strategy #19 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:32 AM Response to Reply #20 |
148. Yours has to qualify as the stupidest post I have ever read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why Americans Refuse to Believe the 9/11 Evidence ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdtroit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. "The evidence that the "official Story" is largely correct ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester_11218 (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 03:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. What evidence are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. How about evidence put forth by serious minded investigators? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 09:21 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Funded by whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Taxpayers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. You are absolutely correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Where are the scientist and engineers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 11:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
49. As another poster wrote, stick with the professors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. You are not serious, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. I answered your question seriously, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. I found the NIST reports to scientifically credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
50. Please see the answer just above, thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. NIST is going to overlook the obvious because of the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 01:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. So you agree that the official investigations were stunted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. What makes you think I agree the investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Wasn't the ground zero site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Testing for explosives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-25-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. You said the official investigations did not consider the full |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 09:40 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Full range of hypotheses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 01:32 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Why not review every conceivable hypotheses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Why investigate for truck bombs and demolition.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. You and LARED keep flogging this line that explosive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
76. You're fixated on the WTC collapse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Even the 9/11 Commission no longer believes the 9/11 Commission Rept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. So the commission report is not factual at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Your rhetorical technique never ceases to amaze me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Most sentient people might wonder why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Congratulations Lared! You no longer believe in the 9/11 Comm theory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 07:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. You need to re-read what I wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 09:04 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. I re-read your post and Congratulations! again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
77. Re... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. suggesting that Pakistan is at war with the USA ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1 (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-23-05 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Hi Jesse.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester_11218 (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 03:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-24-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
21. Maybe in 2006, when the Democrats take back Congress, we can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 10:07 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. But surely the conspiracy extends back to the Clinton administration.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Not possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. pure and clean as the driven snow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 06:28 PM Response to Reply #40 |
133. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Since you say that there was no plot ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. There is a lot to investigate the government for,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. a lot of time and people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Yes, he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. There was nothing new to add. He looked at the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:07 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. What could he add? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 01:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. If you had read Dr. Jones's paper, you would not make that statement. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 02:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I read it and stand by my statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 02:27 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. stand by my statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I believe you need to get a better understanding of what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. evaluate the collapse according to the laws of physics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Why is he incapable of.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Could you please be more specific? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:45 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. By "specific," I mean references to particular statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 05:10 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Calculations are not needed. It's not a pissing contest to show who's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 05:58 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. I am not talking about complex models |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. He understands fundamental facts of physics. If you would read the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. So he is right and the entire academic and engineering communities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:10 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. the entire academic and engineering communities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Ok - if you say so. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #80 |
112. So, Now the Entire Academic and Engineering Communities Concur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. The "silent majority" line didn't work for Nixon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 01:08 AM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Nor for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Where are the calculations, modeling and other experiments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. How would that be possible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. No, there aren't enough numbers in it. ;>) Welcome to DU! nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #72 |
104. Cheers ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. I guess that explains the entire engineering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:04 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. What "thousands of other engineers and scientists"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:48 AM Response to Reply #74 |
102. Haven't they got other jobs to be getting on with ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
85. This was a strong scientific method |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #85 |
103. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:47 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. So it is obviously wrong because it doesn't support your CT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. You must be some kind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:27 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. I can certainly can come here for a good laugh if nothing else.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. No, not at all .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. So why was the study accepted by the engineering and scientific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 07:32 AM Response to Reply #108 |
117. You diffuce illogicalness agian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #108 |
118. Here's a criticism by one of your community ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. ARUP does concur that fire led to the WTC collapse.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 07:41 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. It speaks to the specific point I was making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:02 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Isn't this how science works, though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 05:56 PM Response to Reply #121 |
131. Yes that is how science works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 08:23 PM Response to Reply #131 |
135. As long as the Arup study confirms that fires alone ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #135 |
136. The Arup study does *not* say that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. But isn't the bottom line still the same - NO DEMO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. I don't think it is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. OK - I'll accept the Arup hypothesis then! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. OK I'll leave you over in your place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 05:30 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. This is the Arup theory that I could support... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-01-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Ohhh my head hurts ... ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #135 |
140. "no one is suggesting anything else but fire" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. Thanks for the laugh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:12 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. The thing I found interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:23 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. "a severe fire—without aircraft impact—could still lead to collapse." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:51 PM Response to Reply #123 |
128. I agree it is interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-31-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #123 |
141. "a severe fire—without aircraft impact—could still lead to collapse." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:42 PM Response to Reply #120 |
126. Here is a link to the public comments on the report... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:49 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. I was just about to post that link myself after reading a few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 01:03 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. If their office is anything like my office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Every word was totally right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 08:00 PM Response to Reply #105 |
113. You Accused Someone of Using Circular Logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:22 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. What circular logic have I used? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #63 |
78. Professor Jones' case is for the foolish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 06:53 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. "It collapses like a house of cards"? The WTC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:27 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:40 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. They're a little different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 07:54 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. So let me ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 08:07 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Yes, and it doesn't mean what you think it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. So what holds the top section together while it slides off the top? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 08:37 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. The same structural elements that resisted wind loads for 30 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Actually you are quite incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. The sides took the lateral loads. That's what they were designed for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. So we agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 10:41 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Sure, add the perimeter columns to the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:28 AM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Are you getting to the part where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:06 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. We already covered it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:19 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. I think that's called an evasion of the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:31 PM Response to Reply #99 |
125. The spandrels connecting the perimeter columns made the external steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienSpaceBat (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. What is strange is how the top section was able to rotate at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:41 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #48 |
55. He could have used math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. He doesn't need to use math. He's not trying to prove what happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Excellent observations. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
110. There will never be a new independent investigation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 08:24 PM Response to Reply #110 |
124. Blueprints: According to Peter Lance, an FDNY employee who was an al Qaeda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 08:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
52. Here We Go - It Was Clinton's Fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-27-05 10:37 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I think you missed my point ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-26-05 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
41. The majority of people do not have the time or have the motive to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-30-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
132. Freepers don't even know the "official" story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SittingBull (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
146. Best article yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
147. You are asking an important question with radical implications. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 02:55 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. It's Red Pill/Blue Pill. The Apple or Soma. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 03:13 AM Response to Reply #149 |
150. "Red Pill/Blue Pill" makes sense, but "Apple or Soma" juxtaposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 03:57 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. I'm taking the apple not as the agent of The Fall from Grace but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-05-06 04:06 AM Response to Reply #151 |
152. "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC