Fetzer on Insannity and Jellyfish Colmes Tonight - 9 P.M.

I would never pimp Faux on here, but I will for the Truthers.

I hope Fetzer holds it together and stays away from the Pentagon, which he apparently loves to discuss.

For some Fetzer background, he does a really good job at the end of this video explaining his CD theories (save your breath about how he is not a materials/engineering/physics guy).
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=94

you can bet they will...and repeatedly.

It didn't go too poorly. They wasted a few valuable minutes clarifying whether Fetzer is actually teaching courses about this, and Fox had it wrong. Ollie North was filling in for Hannity and implied that Fetzer lied to get on the show by claiming he teaches a 9/11 course.

The good news is that Fetzer opened by saying there is a large group called 9/11 Scholars For Truth. The first thing he pointed to when asked about how this was a conspiracy is he hit on the Mineta testimony. He then pointed out that they are trying to prove controlled demolition. He didn't spend any time on the Pentagon, although Fox did roll the recent Pentagon tape.

The best part of the segment was Ollie North asking how many people would be involved, and while he did so, he said something like "I know something about secret operations." Fetzer was like, yeah Ollie, as you know, it wouldn't take too many people.

For having like four minutes, Fetzer couldn't do much better.

Short, but somewhat sweet.
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=122

Much of the interview wasn't really relevant to 9/11 - about whether he was teaching a course - but he got in a couple of decent points and didn't advance any no-plane theories, so he goes up slightly in my estimation.

As long as they tinker around the edges, it's okay, and even a good idea, because it makes it seem like OCT'ers are reasonable, open to new information, and not entirely supportive of every detail of the OCT.
So someone like Fetzer CAN actually be acceptable. As long as he follows a certain script.

He said it was blown up. How is that not threatening the OCT? Maybe next time you should try clicking on a link before discussing it.

n/t

he exposed their faux stupid tricks as well.

You could tell Ollie North knew more than he allowed just by his line of questioning. He knows. All the Neo-con Rethugs know, even if they were not directly involved in 9-11. They have to know something. They have to know the party line so they can distract and lead the discussions away from 9-11 truth, or to dismiss it all as CT and silly, so as to continue the cover-up. If not, then the jig is up for all the rotten crooks - the Bush Crime Family and all the Neo-con Rethug administration.

We the People, know too much.

Then as stated by Bushwick Bill in another DU thread on Mineta resigning today 6-23-06, just the day after Fetzer reminds all the Faux viewers of Mineta's testimony to the 9-11 Commission. Very, very interesting . . .
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2352600

Bushwick Bill (265 posts) Fri Jun-23-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message

10. Don't ever forget this.
Edited on Fri Jun-23-06 08:42 AM by Bushwick Bill

Mineta: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president "do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??"
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050724164122860

Professor James Fetzer focused on this yesterday with Hannity (actually, Ollie North) and Colmes, and Mineta resigns the next day?