Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems Lieberman/Bayh/Carper working w/Snow-but SSpriv acct carveout unlikel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 10:11 AM
Original message
Dems Lieberman/Bayh/Carper working w/Snow-but SSpriv acct carveout unlikel

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-centrists5jan05.story

Social Security Battle Likely
In a possible setback to White House efforts, two Democratic centrist groups plan to take a stand against individual investment accounts.
By Ronald Brownstein
Times Staff Writer

January 5, 2005

WASHINGTON — Two groups of prominent Democratic centrists plan to oppose the centerpiece of President Bush's proposal to restructure Social Security, potentially dimming administration hopes of building bipartisan support for its top domestic priority.<snip>

Instead, Democrats have generally echoed former President Clinton in endorsing add-on investment accounts that would provide workers with government subsidies to invest for retirement, but not divert — or carve out — existing payroll tax revenue for that purpose.

That's the alternative the leadership council and the Third Way group are likely to propose. The idea has almost no support among Republicans, who argue that it does not address Social Security's long-term funding problems and creates an expensive entitlement in the form of subsidized retirement savings.<snip>

Bayh said he would consider a private account plan only if it could "maintain the safety net, maintain progressivity and protect the taxpayers ."<snip>

Graham, the South Carolina Republican, hopes to attract support from Democratic moderates through his plan to pay for individual accounts partly by imposing Social Security taxes on earnings up to $200,000 a year, compared with $90,000 now. That would require much less borrowing than most private account plans. <snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC