After watching the DNC chair conference, I like Donnie Fowler

He impressed me the most. I'm not saying Dean wouldn't be good too, but the young man Fowler was impressive to me. He seems to have a good plan for the Dem party from what I heard.

Is it recent?

It took place on Saturday.

I have to find it. :thumbsup:

I think at midnight Eastern time, but check their schedule to be sure.

I'm sure it's also available on-line.

Fowler seemed to be in young blood mode.

New ideas.

He is saying everything Dean is saying and he doesn't have the name recognition or experience.

Of course Dean's supporters can't see this. But the Republicans can, and they're drooling over the possibility of tying Howard Dean to each and every Democrat running for public office in a red state.

Sounded like the other candidates co-opted a lot of his message about grass roots & reform.

Dean sees the need for real change.

He's a great fundraiser.

He creates excitement.

He wants to take the party out of the beltway & to the people.

And he's not wishy washy or spineless.

What's wrong with that?

It does not even bug me anymore.

Keeps happening to him I guess. :shrug:

candidates parrot his lines...


:smoke:

Surprise! Dean wipes the floor with the competition as usual.
If I can't have Dean; here are the runners-up:

Webb
Frost
Rosenberg


I can't stomach Mr. "I like money" Fowler. He hasn't enough experience, either political or personal. I live in MI, and I was NOT impressed with the way the campaign was run here. There were a LOT of rolling eyeballs over constantly changing directives and just plain wrong headed thinking. If it had not been for the push that MoveOn implemented in the final weeks of the election, we might have been a red state this year.

He really was outspoken. Frost was pretty good as well.

I was not a Dean fan in the 2000 election. In this group, Dean was most charismatic, but any of the above four were good spokesmen (Dean, Webb, Frost and Rosenberg). I like that Dean's answers are very action oriented (get something done) responses, and quite direct.

Fowler was the least impressive as a spokesman, though he seems to have good ideas for behind the scenes.

Roehmer was a big big dissappointment - because I was ready to give him a pass on choice (even though it's a big issue for me) if he overall said the right things - but he didn't. Very plastic (Webb was a bit plastic too) and Roehmer's answer was really wrong answer on choice and women's issues. I could see this guy raising a lot of dough off of fat cats, though.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but none of them hold a candle to McAuliffe in terms of quick, intelligent, resposes or stage presence, or ability to articulately and succinctly state core Democratic values. I know this is not the best selection criteria (communications), but there it is.

If you listened to the discussion, all everyone did was criticize everything that was done during his reign.

Not enough money for states, not enough local organizing, ignoring half the country, etc.

And although they mentioned Kerry very little, it was obvious they were blaming him equally.

people love to pile up one him in DU because under his term the Democrats have been tanking but there are a lot of other problems and hurdles our party faced which caused this slump.

I think Dean could do good, but I'd fear the media would again pile up on him.

He'll get better. He just needs a few more years.

Edit: Or perhaps not. It's a matter of time. ;-)

<eom>

The others said some of the same things, but Roemer used his words. This is unreal. Then he had to make sure to insert that Pelosi asked him to run.

made squawking noises.

This happened a lot.

Edit: But I do want to say that a few of them had their own ideas and that Rosenberg knew what was happening.

Not one person in the whole of the United States, nay the world, ever had a thought in their heads until Howard Dean. :eyes:

Dean as DNC chair would be fine with me, but some of this Dean worship shit has got to go.

It is a compliment really. Stop trying to marginalize us by making fun. It does not work.

parrot the lines of others ad infinitum--how naive ARE you?

This is not worship; it's fact, and it's part of what is wrong with American politics.

So go ahead and roll your eyes as a cynic. If this kind of thing is allowed to continue, we will have nothing.

It's just that we disagree on who does the parroting.

That is funny.

especially after tonight.

But it's okay.

:hi:

just because everyone steals Dean's ideas. MYB on the Dean worship business. We'll worship him if we feel like it.

He is their worst nightmare. He has a plan, loyal followers, name recognition and a plan.

Always too worried what REPUBLICANS are going to think.............

And if it pisses them off, even better.

nice try

dolstein, you are ever want to say this, but you seldom cite reasons as to why he would be one.

come through for us. Dean would GO TO the south and instead of altering the agenda to be more RIGHT friendly, he would alter the conversation and FRAME THE DEBATE...something Al From and Bruce Reed keep missing the boat on.

Dean DID inspire a grass roots movement and Dean DID prove you can compete with corporations financially by getting the public involved.

WHAT DEAN ACTUALLY did was go and GET that money that has been displaced since labor union money dropped off in recent years.

Frankly Dolstein, BOTH parties keep ignoring the working poor which is a huge source of votes...


While I was not enthusiastic about a Dean presidency, largely based on his polarizing nature...I DO think he is an excellent spokesperson in many regards and view him as being the BIG PICTURE guy who EXPANDS the party rather than narrows its view to splitting the difference with the opposition on the middle who will NEVER be a reliable vote for us.

Dean will take them on in their states in a way that the DNC has never done before, and probably won't be done unless he is the chairman.

Dean wants to employ a 50 state strategy...fighting for every office, with the online fundraising to do it.. Any Republican that wants to fight that is a fool.

Can you elaborate?

Just mentioning Dean's name can be dangerous it seems.

It's the perfect job for him.

Dean has pluses and minuses, it would certainly be interesting if Dean was chosen.

The only two I know much about are Dean and Roemer.

at what he does. People that worked with him in MI (after he was let go from the Clark camp) were not happy with him at all.

He's more of a Donnie Foulup.

Apparently he didn't run the campaign in his area very well. We have some eyewitness accounts of that.

U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor chosen as Southern Vice Chair


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., was selected by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) to be the Southern Vice Chair for the 2006 election cycle.

Pryor said his new position provides him an opportunity to ensure the issues, values and beliefs important to Southerners are represented as part of the DSCC's mission. His other responsibilities for the DSCC will include candidate recruitment and fundraising.

Pryor said the DSCC has divided its traditional vice chair position into five regional vice chairs this year, allowing it to capitalize on regional expertise.

"I am looking forward to working with the DSCC to rebuild Democratic representation in the South," Pryor said.

In addition to Pryor, the following senators have been selected to represent their regions as vice chairs: Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Northeast; Barack Obama of Illinois, Midwest; Ron Wyden of Oregon, Northwest; and Barbara Boxer of California, West.

Originally published January 8, 2005

We're discussing the job of Chair for the Dem Party.

The jobs you're talking about are for the Senate Campaigns.

U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor chosen as Southern Vice Chair


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., was selected by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) to be the Southern Vice Chair for the 2006 election cycle.

Pryor said his new position provides him an opportunity to ensure the issues, values and beliefs important to Southerners are represented as part of the DSCC's mission. His other responsibilities for the DSCC will include candidate recruitment and fundraising.

Pryor said the DSCC has divided its traditional vice chair position into five regional vice chairs this year, allowing it to capitalize on regional expertise.

"I am looking forward to working with the DSCC to rebuild Democratic representation in the South," Pryor said.

In addition to Pryor, the following senators have been selected to represent their regions as vice chairs: Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Northeast; Barack Obama of Illinois, Midwest; Ron Wyden of Oregon, Northwest; and Barbara Boxer of California, West.

Originally published January 8, 2005

He did a terrible job in MI. If not for the strength of the local parties and the incredbile efforts of ACT, MI would likely not be blue. Trust me, I was deep in the trenches daily, he dropped the ball.

Julie

I know the campaign heads are ultimately responsible for what was done in each state - at least they get the glory and the blame - but most of the problem can be laid on the national Kerry people, in my opinion. I am very disappointed and angry with them.

From what I've read, we experienced pretty much the same lack of commitment from the Kerry people. I'm just glad the race was "somewhat" close here in Maine; otherwise we'd have received even less attention than we did.

eom

I wasn't disagreeing with her.

IB knows of my experience in MI this past election season and I have seen close up that Fowler couldn't run a state-wide campaign, much less a 50 state campaign.

He's not up for the task.

Julie

I don't remember when it was, but it was something about how they (AGSC) was endorsing Fowler for the DNC chair.

I found his "jokes" at this forum too cute by half that merely made sure people knew he was from the South. michael in chicago has a good summary (I agree with) of all the people at the forum yesterday at
mydd.com.

he doesn't have the organizational experience or maturity to run the DNC (IMHO)

My one concern with Howard Dean has been nullified since he has already said that he will not run for President in 2008 should he get this position.

I still toy with the COO idea. Someone to be the national spokesperson and someone to run the day-to-day operations.