Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is splitting Iraq up the only option?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:40 AM
Original message
Is splitting Iraq up the only option?
I say so. Historically, Iraq is not a "real" nation. It was created by British territorialists, and there is no historical context for its boundaries. It contains many different groups, and the only way to keep order in the past was to rule with an iron fist a la the British or Saddam. A stable democratic Iraq in the current boundaries is not possible. We need to split it into a Sunni nation, a Shiite one, and a Kurdish one. We've already seen what happens when you put groups who don't get along in the same nation. It's Israel. It doesn't work very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. It used to be "Divide and conquer"
Leave it to the NeoCons to screw even that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Turkey might not like
that independent Kurdish nation on her border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I believe so
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 01:55 AM by Mojambo
Chop it up man. I know it will probably make that region even more unstable in the long run but man... There comes a point where you gotta get hip to the fact that these cats aren't going to be sharing a pad.

They aren't cool with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe Iraq should decide that, not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, the guy in brain surgery usually isn't making any decisions
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 02:08 AM by Mojambo
But yes, in principle I agree.

<on edit>

It occurs to me that having the guy who PUT you in brain surgery make your decisions might not be the wisest course either.

I submit that the United Nations might be of use here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Too late for that.
Iraq is the 51st state. Why? Because Shrub says so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blurp Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yep, because democracy doesn't solve everything.
There are all sorts of ways people want to live their lives. Simple democracy just means the biggest group gets it's way, screw the rest. It's no panacea.

Dividing up the country means smaller groups get to decide for themselves what sort of country they want.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. That could be a problem for the region......instability breeds instability
since they are all tribes of one faction or another. The end result is going to be Civl War amongst themselves. Hello Washington, we have a big problem here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. How about the option of letting the IRAQIS decide for themselves?
WOW.

RADICAL concept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stella_Artois Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Shhhhh
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 07:56 AM by Stella_Artois
Don't let arrogant Americans think that they actually don't have the right to tell other countries what to do with themselves. It might offend their sense of self importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oops my bad.
Unfortunately I didn't grow up in America, so I lost that self-important arrogance thingie.

:D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. If that's what the Iraqis want--let them do it.
It's not for us or any other countries to draw new lines on the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC