Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Roosevelt Jr., grandson of FDR to Bush -- KNOCK IT OFF!!!!,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:16 PM
Original message
James Roosevelt Jr., grandson of FDR to Bush -- KNOCK IT OFF!!!!,
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 06:21 PM by pbartch
Reid Joins Roosevelt Jr. in Calling on Front Group to Cease and Desist

BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT

Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) today joined James Roosevelt Jr., grandson of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in calling on the group Progress for America Inc. to cease running its latest television ad, which misleadingly features photos of President Roosevelt in its pitch for Social Security privatization.

As James Roosevelt Jr. writes in his letter to Progress for America, "to compare the courage it took to provide a guaranteed insurance program for our seniors and the disabled to the courage it will take to dismantle the most successful social program in history is simply unconscionable."

In a statement, Senate Reid echoed this call.

"Just days after Armstrong Williams, we once again see White House shills misleading the American people in order to advance the President’s conservative agenda. This ad undermines the integrity of a very serious discussion facing our country, and I join James Roosevelt Jr. in calling for it to be pulled from the airwaves immediately."

A copy of Roosevelt Jr.’s letter is attached.

* * *

January 13, 2005


Progress for America, Inc
P.O. Box 19242
Washington, DC 20036

To Whom It May Concern:

It has come to my attention that your organization has begun running an advertising campaign to promote President George W. Bush’s plan to privatize Social Security and cut benefits. The advertisements that are currently being aired feature President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his signing of the original Social Security legislation. I find the use of my grandfather’s image and legacy in your campaign to be highly inappropriate.

For seventy years, Social Security has been the bedrock of retirement security for millions of Americans thanks to the efforts of President Roosevelt. My grandfather would surely oppose the ideas now being promoted by this administration and your organization. Not only that, but to compare the courage it took to provide a guaranteed insurance program for our seniors and the disabled to the courage it will take to dismantle the most successful social program in history is simply unconscionable. We should be working to protect and promote Social Security, not cutting benefits for our seniors.

On behalf of my family, I would ask that you cease using my grandfather’s image in your advertising campaign.

Respectfully,

James Roosevelt Jr.

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/05/01/ale05013.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush to James Roosevelt Jr...
buzz off... I can bet that will be the answer.

Until we have people marching in the streets, in the millions, bush will not get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But...but...It is God's Mandate, Mr. Roosevelt Jr.!
God speaks through Bush. You can't defy god! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shrub was the scourge F.D.R warned us about, fascism. e o m
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 06:30 PM by orpupilofnature57
Why doesn't he emulate F.D.R, when it comes to reasons to declare war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reid, it's a RADICAL agenda that CONSERVES nothing.
Can we at least get our terms right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Right, we shouldn't let anyone get away with calling them
"Conservatives" The proper terms would be "reactionaries" or "the radical right" or "right wing extremists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC