Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soc Sec 'crisis' really a ploy to rid corp's of Payroll Tax !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:53 PM
Original message
Soc Sec 'crisis' really a ploy to rid corp's of Payroll Tax !
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 03:57 PM by EVDebs
Today's paper NYT article by Robert Pear "Social Security Ad Plan Stirs Ire" reveals that a CATO institute shill, 37 year old still-wet-behind-his-ears Andrew Biggs, is busy with more 'the sky is falling' b.s.

Furthermore, the article reveals the true intent of globalized corporations to rid themselves of the 6.2% payroll tax they must administer http://www.alllaw.com/articles/tax/article5.asp

"As an employer, you must also pay a matching amount of FICA taxes for your employees. Currently the social security tax rate is 6.2%. You are required to withhold 6.2% of an employee's wages for social security taxes and to pay a matching amount in social security taxes until the employee reaches the wage base for the year. The wage base for social security tax is $76,000 for the year 2000. Once that amount is earned, neither the employee or the employer owes any social security tax."

The medicare rates, see the article, are a bit less but there is no wage base minimum...this is where the REAL CRISIS is coming, and they suits want to stip SS payroll tax first !

Corporations are already dumping their healthcare and pension plans (see "The Benefits Trap" by Businessweek July 2004) in order to strip themselves of ANY costs to first world citizen, so they will be able to further exploit workers just as in the third world.

Racing to the bottom, with a bullet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. AHA! But of course! Anything to help the Corporations!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I knew in my heart that there were deeper reasons for the SSN attack
Thank you for the information which I will spread readily.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The Benefits Trap article is online too at
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_29/b3892001_mz001.htm

This is buried within that article:

"Perhaps most important, in the global economy, long-established U.S. companies are competing against younger rivals here and abroad that pay little or nothing toward their workers' retirement, giving the older companies a huge incentive to dump their plans. "The house isn't burning now, but we will have a crisis soon if some of these issues aren't fixed," says Steven A. Kandarian, who ended a two-year stint as the executive director of the PBGC in February. Kandarian is not optimistic about how that crisis might play out, either. "By that time it will be too late to save the system. Then you just play triage."

IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY...COMPETING AGAINST YOUNGER RIVAL HERE AND ABROAD...

The MSM is ignoring the race to the bottom and the destruction of the saftey net, all for the almighty dollar. They have no shame. They will sell their mothers and fathers ... as part of the 'ownership' society. Actually the Rentier Society but who's kidding whom.

I have only the power of the pen, not the sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. but EU workers get even better benes: how they competitive with BETTER
benes than we have?

the old "cut the peon benefits " to be competitive with foreigners.. fails when one sees EU compete ,.. and EU enjoys much more in the way of benefits.

like 6 weeks annual vacations.. ten years of unemploy benefits.. free doctors, free college.

If less for CEO's such things can be done. Our CEO'S get far more than european ones.

Any other reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep. It's a tax cut for corporations. Tax cut for corporations.....
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 04:02 PM by pinto
I think the plan doesn't exempt all 6.2% for "privatization", something like 4%?, but the truth is, that's a lot of tax cut if you've got a few thousand employees.....


(on edit) we ought to call it corporate welfare, if they want to play that game....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Plenty of commissions to be made curning all that lucre, huh ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe anything Bush or his cronies say.
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 04:13 PM by marew
I do know Bush will do everything he can to take from the middle class and give to the rich. I'm less than 4 years from collecting SS at 62 and spent my lifetime preparing to be able to retire hopefully with an adequate income. Don't want the rules changed now.
If we didn't have these enormous tax breaks for corporations for the wealthy and corporations, things would be much better. Then consider the war which is draining billions. I read a while ago that in his inaugural speech Bush is going to push his idea of "spreading democracy" around the world. He believes that since he was reelected he has the power to do that! He is absolutely MAD! We are all in the middle of a very dark period in American history.

For those who missed David Letterman the other night...this will make you laugh. So much said in jest is true.

Top Ten Perks Of Being The New White House Dog

10. You're one of the few dogs that is smarter than his master.

9. Heart worm? I think Cheney's got a pill for that.

8. If you eat the President's briefing papers, it's not like he'll notice.

7. "Miss Beazley" isn't half as ridiculous as "Condoleezza"

6. K-9 color blindness means you don't have to worry about that terror chart crap.

5. Cannot be put in a kennel without approval of both the House and Senate.

4. Rumsfeld smells like bacon.

3. Get the same high-quality leashes that are used on Abu Ghraib prisoners.

2. At the rate Bush's Cabinet members are leaving, will be a senior advisor in no time.

1. An owner who sleeps as much as you do!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. where FICA invested now, under FDR's orig plan?
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 05:36 PM by oscar111
By FICA, i try to say, all funds for ss that are set aside by both worker and boss, and put in the gov's hands ... where it is called "the ss fund,", i think.

a newbie to all this// parents never explained it to me.

PS a post here said some study found fifty billion/yr would maintain current ss benefits till 21oo, so no crisis.

I know, that truman's tax structure would add far more.. 2. 7 Trillion additional tax funds / yr. SS would only need 5O Billion, part of just one trillion.

Total tax revenue thus, 2.7 plus current 2.4, for a result of 5.1 Trillion.

No ss crisis exists. None.

Dump failed Reaganomics, return to the healthy Truman tax structure.
Wages are lower than when Reaganomics began.. adjusted for inflation.

Reaganomics only sparked mass homelessness and mass hunger.
For 24 years.

We had prosperity during Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So true newbie ! Supply-side economics is 'voo-doo economics'
as GHWB said. Now W just won't listen to his old man, just like on Iraq policy either...

"Honor thy father..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. ROFLMFAO !!!!!!!! Go Letterman, go ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. That, AND welch on the debt to Social Sec (us)

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_01_02.php#004327
(snip)
But about $3 trillion of those dollars we needed to fund the 1980s and 1990s deficits we managed to borrow closer to home. We borrowed it from the Social Security (and a few other government) trust fund(s).

Almost the entirety of President Bush's Social Security phase-out plan comes down to a simple proposition: finding out how not to pay it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Where are the Concord Coalition when we need them ?
How can any Republican with an ounce of common sense support this President ? This is the litmus test; if they vote for this privatization crap Sen Reid and the Dems should not 'go along' for the ride for the next four years....Someone HAS TO fight back !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well if there going that far then they can eliminate the rest of the taxes
removed from our checks. Any excuse they can dream up to make more profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Short sighted idiots; With US consumption dropping like a stone
that's 2/3rds of GDP dropping, along with a rising 'tax' of gasoline prices going up, which is about $6 billion off of GDP for every sustained $1 rise in the price of gas, which is from the $25 per barrel the Saudis said they wanted. That's a huge hit on top of the rest of Bush's failed economic policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote03 Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm surprised that this lil tidbit hasn't been mentioned...
on "C'orporate De Jour Media" more often lately......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC