Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone taking bets that Monica Crowley is "on the payroll"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:58 AM
Original message
Anyone taking bets that Monica Crowley is "on the payroll"?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200501200004


During MSNBC's coverage of President Bush's inauguration, radio host and MSNBC contributor and analyst Monica Crowley (formerly of FOX News), made the misleading claim that "people in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, are very enthusiastic about the idea of controlling some of their own money and not allowing the government to do it for them." But a Media Matters for America analysis of six recent polls that examine the issue suggests that younger Americans' support for private accounts is not as clear as Crowley claimed: (1) some polls indicate a significant drop in support for privatization among all age groups when the potential realities of such a system -- decreased guaranteed benefits and $2 trillion in transition costs -- are included in the questions; and (2) some polls also show that there is far less support for private accounts among those in their 30s and 40s as compared to workers aged 18-29.

(more)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. and $2 trillion is not an accurate figure
As Paul Krugman points out, $2 trillion is only the beginning of the cost to taxpayers. It will take about $15 trillion of borrowing over time for the program to possibly beginning to start to return its investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. If not, I'd be surprised...
...that sounds like cheerleading to me.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Monica is Hannity, Jr. She's an wicked and twisted liar. Before AAR
she had a radio show on WABC. She replaced the liberal host, Richard Bey and immediately started pimping the war and everything else bushco. During our primaries she spread lies about all candidates. And, she tried to get that Nixon/FBI story going about Kerry. She's a disgusting asswipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Either way, she's a media whore
of the lowest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. They don't call her "Monica" for nothing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Of course,
I've been thinking that for years now. She's so transparent about it too. Why do people buy into the media spin doctors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Did anyone write to MSNBC regarding this matter?
I don't recall ever having heard the woman in question since I no longer have cable. But htose who have heard her owe it to all Democrats to write to the tv station and point out her lies and her obvious ArmstrongWilliams-izing of administration programs.

It would take a few minutes more than making two posts on DU to just pull down an email form and send off of message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Of course you are right, but I think this is far bigger than that.
I think we need to focus our energy on the RW think tanks.

I can't explain it all here, but if you want more info read David Brock's "The Republican Noise Machine."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes, think they listened?
1st time she was on MSNBC I wrote them & told them to throw her back! Compared her to a wickedly screwed up cross between Ann Coulter & Rona Barrett, suggested they sell her contract at a very reduced rate to Faux News, & asked them to please get a big ol' washrag & wash some of the excessive makeup off her face before someone accused them of pimping instead of reporting - inquired whether they were so hard up they had to take right wing hand-me-downs, I was worried that they would get something really yucky on their pants if they had to share news chairs.

In those words.
I REALLLLY didn't like her ... it only took one time to figure that out!

Obviously, they don't value my humble opinion! HUMPH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But that's how the rightwing first got the media attention..
They started with letter writing campaigns complaining and accusing the media of being liberal. The big money that has financed them came later. If nothing else, it allows the CM (Corporate Media) know that we, as consumers are watching and that we have opinions also that must be respected.

Keep writing no matter how useless it seems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Someday you'll all be quoting this...
See if she has ties to one of the RW think tanks (as an ex-FAUX reporter, it isn't a stretch).

Follow the talking points which lead to the money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. How does one research this?
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 09:41 AM by annabanana
Where did Crowley go to school? I do know that she was a "Foreign Policy Assistant" to Nixon from 1990 until he died, (according to her official bio)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. google her as*
shes as bad as annie girl....did a quick search and she reads like a GOP nut.try it..check out this bit



Scarborough Country • Monica Crowley • MSNBC



MSNBC's Crowley distorted 9-11 report in interview with right-wing "terrorism expert"


Filling in for host Joe Scarborough on MSNBC's Scarborough Country, during an interview with MSNBC terrorism analyst Steve Emerson -- a former journalist who has received funding from right-wing financier Richard Mellon Scaife -- Crowley stated that "I do think there's a reason" to create the database, then falsely asserted that "the 9-11 report indicated that our colleges and universities may in fact be breeding grounds for terrorism, for terrorists and terrorist activity."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200411300009



News Hounds: Is Former FOX Analyst Monica Crowley A Plagiarist?
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/12/22/is_former_fox_analyst_monica_crowley_a_plagiarist.php - Cached


Media Matters has also documented some of Crowley's past distortions and false assertions:

* Crowley baselessly claimed that Germany was among the "countries that dealt with Saddam Hussein, possibly illegally" in the oil-for-food scandal.
* Crowley echoed the false claim of numerous FOX News Channel anchors that an elementary school in Cupertino, California, "banned" the Declaration of Independence because it mentioned God.
* Crowley misrepresented the findings of the 9-11 Commission in an effort to justify her support for a controversial national database that would track college students and maintain personal information about them.

http://www.ppipes.org/?q=node/4533


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. what? anyone else
checking her out?.......shes a bias hag and should be called on it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC