Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"US encouraged the pro-Western shah of Iran to develop nuclear power..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:11 AM
Original message
"US encouraged the pro-Western shah of Iran to develop nuclear power..."
From a June, 2003, article in the St. Petersburg Times...

"A nuclear-free Mideast?'

Ironically, Iran's own nuclear program is said to have started with America's blessing. In the early '70s, the U.S. government encouraged the pro-Western shah of Iran to develop nuclear power as an alternative energy source.

"Americans advised Iran to generate 20,000 megawatts of electricity . . . and submitted plans for building power plants. Now they say Iran does not need nuclear power since it has abundant oil and gas," Iran's former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, angrily noted last month.

The nuclear program was suspended twice - first in 1979, when the shah was overthrown, and again in the late '80s when Iraqi air strikes damaged the reactors at Bushehr.

Russia is now building a reactor at the same site, one of several nuclear power plants Iran says it will need in the future. The country's population of 67-million is expected to nearly double over the next three decades.

Iran has 9 percent of the world's oil, but "at the rate of energy consumption today, it will become a net importer of petroleum products by the year 2020 or 2025," says Amirahmadi of the American Iranian Council. "The argument that Iran has oil and gas and therefore does not need nuclear technology is not a good argument."

more...

http://www.sptimes.com/2003/06/08/news_pf/Worldandnation/Nuclear_Iran_on_the_U.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. We have our fingers in pies all over the world and we so frequently wind
up with those pies smashed in our faces. (Giving weapons to Saddam... The CIA training OBL... anyone? anyone?)

When will we learn?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks, and "The "28 Mordad" coup, as it is known by its Persian date,
was a watershed for Iran, for the Middle East and for the standing of the United States in the region. The joint U.S.-British operation ended Iran's drive to assert sovereign control over its own resources and helped put an end to a vibrant chapter in the history of the country's nationalist and democratic movements. These consequences resonated with dramatic effect in later years. When the Shah finally fell in 1979, memories of the U.S. intervention in 1953, which made possible the monarch's subsequent, and increasingly unpopular, 25-reign intensified the anti-American character of the revolution in the minds of many Iranians."

http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB126/index.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC