what does DU think of Ken Mehlman's letter and my comments?

Hi,

Some of you others probably do like me...I've signed up for the GOP newlsetter under a fake name. So guess what he sends out regarding Bush's "strategy" document? Empty words that say the same thing they've always said which is..."SHUT UP>We'll stay there as long as we feel like....which is pretty damn long time. Maybe 50 years. FUCK YOU, America!"

Here's what he said in the letter. BOLD print is my emphasis. Italics are my comments:
------------------------------------
Dear xxxx,

Speaking at the U.S. Naval Academy, President Bush laid out the plan for victory in Iraq. America's strategy is clear: we will help Iraqis build a stable democracy, a strong economy, and security forces that can defend the Iraqi people and fight the terrorists. And we will never give in to the enemy by cutting and running before the job is done. opening paragraph says NOTHING about any thresholds we or Iraqis could meet that would cause us to get troops home. none at all

Read the President's complete Strategy for Victory in Iraq here, and write a letter to the editor to spread the word about the President's plan.

In Iraq, our troops' heroic work is paying off. Iraqis will soon vote in their third democratic election this year. Groups that boycotted earlier elections are joining the political process. On the security front, Iraqi troops and police are growing stronger and more ready to defend their country. Increasingly, Iraqis are taking the lead in joint operations to root out the terrorists. As Iraqi forces stand up, our troops' mission will shift away from patrolling Iraqi cities and towards hunting down the most dangerous terrorists. (nothing here about EVER leaving. EVER. you really SHOULD write letters to the editor about this NON plan to leave Iraq. it's malarky.)

In spite of the incredible progress made by our troops, some in Washington still are proposing artificial deadlines for withdrawal. This is not a plan for victory. (yes, in a moment of honesty, you mention the thing I am reading is not a plan for victory at all but an excuse for open ended mission to stay in Iraq forever. Cutting and running would send a message to the terrorists that our will can be broken, inviting more attacks on our troops and on our homeland. It would tell our friends that America is a weak and unsteady ally. So long as George W. Bush is our President, America will never return to the dangerous, pre-September 11th illusion that the terrorists can be appeased by simply turning our backs. you mean like you've done in Afghanistan by allowing Taliban and warlords to pretty much rule the land outside of Kabul? you mean like your giving up on putting resources on finding Osama and his top agents?

In response to the President's clear plan, Democrats like minority leader Harry Reid offer empty political attacks, calling the President's speech "tired rhetoric" even before it was given. after 5 years of this bullshit, they've pretty much come to expect it. Yet these same Democrats agree with key elements of President Bush's strategy, with Sen. Joe Biden writing that "we must forge a sustainable political compromise between Iraqi factions, strengthen the Iraqi government and bolster reconstruction efforts, and accelerate the training of Iraqi forces." That sounds exactly like what the President is proposing. These Democrats fundamentally agree on what needs to happen in Iraq, but they're attacking for political gain. Are these attacks designed to help us win the war on terror, or help them win the next election?

President Bush offers a way forward on Iraq, not empty political posturing. Read the strategy and spread the word in your community.

Sincerely,

Ken Mehlman
Chairman, Republican National Committee

suprising this isn't catching more notice since any measurement for basis of withdrawing or drawing down US troops from Iraq is TOTALLY LACKING in both this political pap and that stupid "Bush Strategy" document.

Ack! :puke:

So.. did they remove you off their list after that response or do they just ignore responses? :shrug:

they don't know the person they sent it to is the same one that replied with the comments.

so far...no response. just sent today.

"In spite of the incredible progress made by our troops, some in Washington still are proposing artificial deadlines for withdrawal. This is not a plan for victory. (yes, in a moment of honesty, you mention the thing I am reading is not a plan for victory at all but an excuse for open ended mission to stay in Iraq forever.)"

Read that statement again "In spite of the incredible progress made by our troops, some in Washington still are proposing artificial deadlines for withdrawal. This is not a plan for victory." He is saying that people who suggest removing troops from Iraq have no plan for victory. Now we of course know this is crap. Getting out of Iraq in itself would be a victory for humanity, but Mehlman is not concerned about humanity he is concerned about the oil that they hope to get pumped out of the desert. The Bush administration has already failed at achieving their version of what constitutes victory however and no matter what they do there is no way they can win this battle, but unfortunately they are going to try anyways and they don't care how many people die in the war they are certain to lose.

pulling the one quote from him "This is not a plan for victory" and applying it to Bush's own tired rhetoric.

LOL. But that gives me an idea......parse his words and regurgitate.

President Bush laid out the plan for victory in Iraq.... we will never give in to the enemy by cutting and running before the job is done...our troops' mission will shift away from patrolling Iraqi cities and towards hunting down the most dangerous terrorists....This is not a plan for victory.