House passed $95 billion in tax cuts, while cutting programs to help poor

NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/08/politics/08cnd-cong.html?ex=1134709200&en=5ae4ce9bef635235&ei=5009&partner=MSN_NYTHOME

Despite Deficit, House Approves $56 Billion in Tax Cuts

By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
Published: December 8, 2005

WASHINGTON, Dec. 8 - The House of Representatives passed the last and biggest portion of $95 billion in tax cuts today, a move that reflected the willingness to place tax cuts above the risk of higher budget deficits in years to come.

Voting 234 to 197, almost purely along party lines, the House approved $56 billion in tax cuts over five years, just one day after it passed other tax cuts totaling $39 billion over five years. The biggest provision would extend President Bush's 2001 tax cut for stock dividends and capital gains for two years at a cost of $20 billion. All of the House's maverick Republican conservatives, who had criticized their party leaders two months ago for being too soft about spending cuts, voted enthusiastically for the tax cuts, which add up to nearly twice as much as the spending cuts passed last month.

"Clearly, tax relief is part of the deficit solution, not part of the problem," said Representative Jeb Hensarling, Republican of Texas and one of the mavericks.

<<snip>>

Democrats accused the Republican majority of expanding tax cuts to the nation's very richest families while cutting programs to help the poor.
"The choice is clear - tax relief that goes to people making a million bucks or more, and cutting student loans, cutting food support for people who need it and cutting child support," said Representative Sander Levin, Democrat of Michigan.

If they did nine dems wouldn't of jumped on the republican bandwagon on this bill.

who they are? please let us know, thanks.

1.Robert Cramer (Alabama)
2.John Barrow (Geogria)
3.Jim Marshall (Georgia)
4.Melissa Bean (Illinois)
5.Mike Mcintyre (North Carolina)
6.Dan Boren (Oklahoma)
7.Lincoln Davis (Tennessee)
8.Bart Gordon (Tennessee)
9.Henry Cuellar (Texas)

better. And that we still have lock step Repugs is a great issue for us to run on. Although very few Dems are going to bring up Dividend and Capital Gains taxes when many older folks rely on it to supplement their incomes...

The point is that Corporate and Wealthy Taxes need to be increased and that's where the problem is. Breaks for Dividends are needed so folks get out of the high flying techs that the traders use and get into safety...Capitol Gains give aways need to be reigned in some..but its the Corporate Give Away Taxes and the Wealth getting other breaks that are really the problem. ... No one ever talks about it in a way that hold the Corporations and Top 5% accountable, though.

So they are kind of getting what they deserve. And that goes for the people who didn't bother to vote either. I consider a non-vote to be a Bush vote. So if some single mother who works at Wal-Mart who is on food stamps didn't bother to vote last year, well...she is sure learning her lesson now.

that was sent to wrong voting place or who waited in line but her babysitter wouldn't stay past a certain time so she had to leave before voting. Or maybe she had to leave to get to work before she could vote. She could be one who voted Kerry and didn't notice the machine registered bush.