Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if lieberman takes rummy's job...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:28 PM
Original message
if lieberman takes rummy's job...
what happens to lieberman's senate seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure it would go to another Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good answer, lol I can't stand lieberman. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Republican Governor of CT would appoint a Republican
I just posted this elsewhere -

The Republican governor of CT would appoint a fellow Republican to the seat. While she is fairly moderate, she is still a Republican and a Republican appointee would have a leg up in the run for the empty seat in 2006, when Lieberman's term expires.

The top Republicans in CT
Nancy Johnson, long-term congresswoman in a Dem district, conservative
Rob Simmons, 3 term congressman in a Dem district, conservative
Chris Shays, long-term congressman, moderate.

If Rell appointed any of those 3, the House seat would likely be a Democratic pickup. It might also get popular AG Blumenthal into the race for the Senate next year. He's like a small state version of Spitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. no special election?
the governor just get to appoint whoever they see fit to replace an "elected" official. that sounds... counterintuitive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey, they (reps) want to go back to the old way of the governor appointing
all the Senators instead of the citizens voting them into office. They don't think we are smart enough (and too dem) to vote for them directly. If they get enough votes they may actually repeal that amendment to the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yeah, somebody should probably fix that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. A correction: Governors never appointed all the US Senators
it was a vote of the state legislature before 1913 and the constitutional amendment.

Still, a bad idea to revoke tat amendment and it's not going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's the US Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. i didn't realize it was stated there
seems silly to me. maybe an amendment is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No prob, states can get around this with special election provisions as
Massachusetts has done. I think Oregon has the smae law as I cannot remember an appointed Senator after Packwood resigned, just a special election.

In states like these no appointed Senator serving until the next even year election as in New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. EXACTLY. that is what's really going on here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Will his seat be liberated, confiscated, or remain the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC