Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update: MSNBC (Hardball) confirms Fitzgerald meeting grand jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 04:52 PM
Original message
Update: MSNBC (Hardball) confirms Fitzgerald meeting grand jury
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_to_present_more_information_to_1213.html



Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald will present additional evidence to a grand jury Wednesday morning in the CIA leak case that could result in an indictment being handed up against White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, sources close to the investigation told RAW STORY.

MSNBC's Hardball has confirmed the story. To see a video of their report, visit this link; the link to the video is in the third box down on the right-hand column, beneath the rectangle advertisement. Unfortunately, we can't link to the video directly.

Although the grand jury’s term expires in 18 months, Fitzgerald is expected to wrap up the case as it relates to Rove before the end of the year, the sources said.

Fitzgerald intends to present the grand jury with the sworn testimony from Rove’s attorney Robert Luskin, and Time magazine reporter Viveca Novak. The sources close to the case said Fitzgerald is still intent on seeking an indictment against Rove on at least one count of making false statements to FBI and Justice Department investigators when he was first interviewed in early October 2003 about his role in the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shuster just said on Abrams Report -- no meeting today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if MSNBC is saying it, it has to be true.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the question, is which one?
Shuster was live when he stated 20 minutes ago on the very same MSNBC that there was no meeting today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wait for Olbermann, hopefully he'll hammer it out...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Shuster just said again on Hardball that there was NO meeting today.
Rove making a deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Where would we be without Olbermann? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Raw Story just posted an update that the meeting got canceled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Just saw it. Thanks...
Wish these folks could get their facts straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please Fitz, nail this fucker
I hope the meeting getting cancelled doesn't mean anything. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Me too. The Raw Story source says the did "move forward"
That sounds ominous without a meeting with the GJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. If Rove agreed to make a plea -- would an indictment be still necessary?
Edited on Wed Dec-14-05 06:02 PM by Bumblebee
If the meeting did get canceled, there may be stories in the NYT and WP. When the Libby thing happened without Rove indictment, Fitz filed something sealed with the judge. My instinct then was that it was a sealed indictment for Rove, just tabled for the time being. If he was in court yesterday, could it be that he agreed with the judge to unseal it, having obtained the blessing of the new jury, rather than going through the indicment procedure all over again? Does anyone know how it works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't think that's how it worked
if it was a sealed indictment there would be no reason to have the GJ hear more re Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks, I wasn't sure about the the legal procedures involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe it's because of what Novak said today?
Edited on Wed Dec-14-05 08:25 PM by jenmito
Robert Novak saying Bush knows the source... Maybe Fitz is going to look into it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC