Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which "senior" Democratic Senators were informed of Bush's spying?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 07:59 PM
Original message
Which "senior" Democratic Senators were informed of Bush's spying?
From what I have gleaned, it was the intelligence committee. Joe Biden? Any more Democrats on that committee? Jay Rockefeller?

Shouldn't we find out what they were told?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure would like to know


I hear that it was Rockefeller for sure but that even thou he heard it, it did not approve doing it.


Does that make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. At the time, I don't think Rockefeller was
the judge in charge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. I think he came in after and raised issues about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Feinstein
and Harry Reid is an 'ex officio' member
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You mean Lady Diana Feinstein ~



Isn't she a hawk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Feinstein said today in the Senate
that she never knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. That she never knew..?
that the NSA was spying on American citizens??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Feinstein said...
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence and Judiciary committees who has often sided with the administration on national security issues, called the program "the most significant thing I have heard in my 12 years" in the Senate and suggested the president may have broken the law by authorizing surveillance without proper warrants.

"How can I go out, how can any member of this body go out, and say that under the Patriot Act we protect the rights of American citizens if, in fact, the president is not going to be bound by the law?" she asked

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601825.html


Feinstein is the biggest fraud since George Bush. She's up to her neck in complicit guilt and lying through her teeth to protect herself. She has consistently refused to listen to her (obviously smarter) constituients since the war crimes began. Her stint as a conservative democratic is over... she has no credibility as a Democrat and doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of re-election in California. Can you tell she makes me angry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are Intelligence issues that they can not speak of.....
But, that does not preclude them to act as if they were ignorant to the White House shenanigans. You can speak out without ever revealing facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. They said something on the news about
Jay Rockefeller---somthing to the effect of him knowing and being opposed but because of the rules regarding espionage he could not speak publicly about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Chairs and Ranking Members
of the Intelligence committees..But they are precluded from revealing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Pat Buchanan said Rockefeller was one,on McLaughlin Group tonight
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 08:24 PM by Algorem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's the BIG QUESTION...Kentuck...who sat on this for a year when
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 08:28 PM by KoKo01
Kerry could have been elected if this had been blasted out there for the American People with a Democratic Grassroots just raring to go. We even have the "internets" who would have been after this on a dime?

Instead we got bogged down with AWOL where Rather got Axed..but what if we had known this?

New York Times (Jayson and Judith Shills) SAT ON THIS THROUGH THE ELECTION?

WHERE IS THE DEM OUTRAGE...from our "so called Elected Officials?" How many of them will "step up to the plate" and be counted. :shrug:

I've sort of given up at this point....:-( I don't have much hope for Rockefeller and the others who are "career politicians to help us "Grassrooters out with this latest revelation in a long string of aggregious and reprehensible acts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. tough call here ...
Feinstein said today during her speech on the Senate floor that those on the committee who knew about the spying were bound by law not to disclose classified information ...

of course, one could make an argument that the spying was unconstitutional and they had an obligation to disclose it ... the bottom line is that they probably couldn't have done it ...

btw, the same was true of pre-war intelligence lies ... Senator Bob Graham alluded to the fact that he knew the intelligence was fabricated but was unable to disclose what he knew and how he knew it because it was classified ...

i certainly agree there should be DEM OUTRAGE that these constitutional violations were authorized by the WH ... it's a tougher call to blame those Democrats on the committee who knew about it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well...there's the other view...That We Needed to do EVERYTHING after 9/11
to keep us SAFE?

What my question is...the one that bogs me down in my mind...my thinking ..is that we NEVER/EVER were ATTACKED HERE AT HOME with a CO-ORDINATED EFFORT like 9/11 where our Government FAILED BIG TIME TO KEEP US SAFE?

Not Clinton/Poppy/Reagan/Carter/Ford/Nixon/Truman/Eisenhower/FDR and all?

Why was it the "Chimp off the old Blockhead" was the ONLY PRESIDENT TO HAVE THE MOST MAJOR CO-ORDINATE ATTACK IN AMERICAN HISTORY...AND.....Where were the "Cold War Safe Guards?"

Clinton disbanded them? ....Yeah...So, why didn't weakkneed/blowjob Clinton manage to get us ATTACKED IN A COORDINATED MAJOR ABC&only "D" failed and was blown up? What if EF&G were planned?

Why the Hell does Chimp GET OFF ON THIS? Where are folks pointing out that THE BUCK STOPPED WITH HIM!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rockefeller is the MOST TO BLAME! Yet...he claims...I was new to
Committee and "I don't know anything...it's all so new to me...I really couldn't understand it all."

If a Rockefeller can't understand it all ...then we are lied to or he's the dullest "porch bulb" in the Rockefeller Dynasty that he didn't GET what was going on...even if he was "new" to the Committee.

I just can't see how that fits as an EXCUSE.. Can You All???? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wow. Great Profiles in courage there. NOT.
NO SUCH THING as having to remain silent in the face of presidential lies and flouting of the constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I was having a discussion with my better half...
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 12:29 AM by kentuck
I said, "I don't believe I would have sat there and knowing it was illegal to wiretap American citizens and not report it anonymously to a reporter or somebody..."

She said, "But you have integrity..." I thought, "Don't we all have that?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Here is the website.
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 12:31 AM by madfloridian
http://intelligence.senate.gov/members.htm

Bob Graham is not listed but he was a member in 02, I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC