Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question re: Oklahoma City

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:46 AM
Original message
Question re: Oklahoma City
Not that I think OKC was handled all that well (from all sides) - but - how come after the "worst terrorist attack on American Soil" (and I'm still sick of hearing that phrase), we didn't need a Patriot Act or secret spying on citizens? Now, to qualify this - yes, 9/11 was "worse", and yes, I'm sure it wasn't a good time for people who checked out the Anarchist's Cookbook from the local library. But - this was a very shocking thing. A homegrown American turned crazy bomber - who knows how many others like him there might be? And yet, Clinton didn't see a need to toss out constitutional rights. And still, we didn't have another incident like that.

So can we say that scary things may happen, from time to time, that are beyond control and anticipation? And that it's better for 99.999999% of Americans to retain their rights, even if 0.000001% might snap and do something terrible?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. But McVey was a good old American boy
and a Christian, so we didn't need a Patriot Act. It's them furriner Mooslims that are a threat and we should kill them all because they are DIFFERENT than US :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He also ran in Rightwing circles...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's it exactly
Tim McVeigh looks too much like them to be a terrorist. It's the same reason those folks in North Carolina who admitted selling food to Eric Rudolph aren't in Gitmo for supporting terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Silly Lib-ruls
First, al Queda was behind 9-11, McVeigh was just a patsy. I heard it on some right wing talk show, so it must be true.

Clinton was a wussy boy without the courage to deal with these evil doers.

Every American should be glad George W. Bush is in the White House and will stop at nothing to protect them.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I thought Saddam was behind 9/11
oh wait, now I'm confused again. it depends on which speech you listen to, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. al Queda Behind Okalhoma City
that's what I meant to say.

And everyone knows, al Queda and Saddam are pretty much one and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. John Doe #2 was an A-RAB!
It was a Mooslem Terra plot!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, Clinton wanted to increase security measures and
get a small portion of the controls that Bush now has in place due to "the Patriot Act" . . .

But the Repukes screamed bloody murder about BC turning this country into a police state . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly
"The Terrorist Next Door" covers this in some depth (IIRC, it's been 3 years since I read it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you want an idea how many there are out there,
try driving around, oh say for instance, the backwoods areas of Idaho with Kerry bumper stickers or maybe in a car with Federal Government license plates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. McVeigh was a rightwinger, so his victims got what they deserved
The worst leftwing act of terrorism was the arson of the Vail restautant in 1998. No one was hurt
The worst rightwing act of terrorism was the OKC bombing. 168 deaths and over 500 injuries.

Need I say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I would argue that the Weather people and SLA were left-wing terror groups
The Weather People killed a few in their day, and the SLA got in that shoot-out with LAPD that got most of them killed.

I would say that both groups were left-wing terror networks. Both spouted extreme left beliefs, and really were no different than McVeigh/Nichols and the militia types out there, except for their political beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Works for me.
Yes, we can say that.

Furthermore, if you read about the OKC bombing, you'll find that the FBI had so many undercover people at that Elohim City place (where McVeigh hung out), they probably outnumbered the actual, real, Elohim City nutball supremacists there. (I'm exaggerating, but they DID have an undercover presence among those people.)

The FBI has often infiltrated white supremacist groups such as Klan chapters, and the result has sometimes been that the FBI guys end up running the show. I'm talking about agents provocateur. I mean, agents provocateur are a very tried-and-true part of plots throughout history. "Just give them enough rope and they'll hang themselves", the Hitler fascists may have said of the communists, before the Reichstag Fire. But what happens when your dumbass political opponents are just taking too long to "hang themselves" with all that rope you're giving them? You have to get in there and organize them and hasten them on the path to whatever atrocity they were contemplating... then, once the atrocity is accomplished, YOU and your group appear to "save the day".

I remember that a lawyer (son of a lawyer who'd represented, of all people, James Earl Ray) told myself and some others that there wasn't a single federal judge present in the Murrah Building that morning. (And there were lots of judges housed there.) Just a coincidence, I'm sure.

Notice how quickly they executed McVeigh.

Before OKC, the militia groups were getting stronger and stronger. Wingnuts were afraid of the Clinton administration, so they kept organizing in militias. After OKC, the militia groups were THE Enemy. It became Our Federal Government's patriotic duty to shut them down. And it did shut them down. How convenient that the horrible atrocity of OKC was committed by two members of a militia group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. China probably has it's citizens under the most survellience in the world
and yet it hasn't stopped terrorism there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC