|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:23 PM Original message |
Roll Call Underway on Alaska Drilling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Landrieu, Nelson, the usual suspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DakotaDemocrat (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Landreu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. Exactly, this must have torn her apart- damn Stevenson! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Reid had the votes and probably gave her his blessings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hwmnbn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. Any repukes vote no?.......nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Yes, a couple-this is the cloture vote and it still looks o k, if my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Chafee, Dewine voted NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Chafee just voted NO to drilling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkiGuy (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Dewine NO, Snowe and Collins YES, Akaka YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. What is up with the Hawaiians? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I'm not sure about the reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. What I have heard is the Alaska and Hawaii senators have always.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
57. Yes - that's true, there is some sort of agreement it seems... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
54. My Guess is :Military Spending benefit Hawaii enourmously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
59. It's a sellout by Inouye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Damn it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Not yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I didn't realize that this was for a vote for cloture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Has the snake Norm Coleman vioted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:28 PM Original message |
No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. Contact info? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. Let's see how Lieberman votes on this. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. He's already come out quite strongly for the filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Lieberman voted against cloture, and gave a great speech on Senate floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Vote being held open to twist arms? Count only 57 votes, 60 needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. One thing about Joe...he does what he says he will do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud_Lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is this the actual vote or the vote for cloture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. cloture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hwmnbn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. vote for cloture......nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. Chafee votes NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbird42 (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Dewine, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbird42 (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
15. Lieberman no, chaffee no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. OUCH! Dewine votes NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
22. I think there are enough votes to stop the drilling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Fingers crossed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Seems like we could lose one more and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Akaka, Inouye, Nelson (NE), Landrieu - who is the 5th Dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Byrd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I heard him give a speach against the bill before the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I saw he voted Aye in another post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Do you perhaps mean Richard Burr, R-NC instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Thats R-NC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. You are so right! Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. We won! Frist just changed his vote to NO to bring it up again later! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
37. WHOAAA!! FRIST votes NO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
63. It's a senate manuever, trust me - he would have voted "YES" for the win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
38. Frist - no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
40. 56-44 Drilling is stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
41. 56-44 WE WIN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. They just called for ANOTHER vote on cloture?? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Maybe a quorum call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. They asked for a reconsideration of the vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillDem (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. I'll never understand parliamentary procedure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCal (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. It sure is nice to win one once in a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
43. What was that, a motion to reconsider? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. So Frist can bring this up again in the future. Arm twisting, anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. He must bring the bill up again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
50. This is excellent news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. double post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. Here is the Senate roll call vote on S. 1932, the social program cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Note that just enough R's voted NO to require Cheney to be tiebreaker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
55. It would be amazing if someone in the senate said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. It is not a drilling bill - it is the defense appropriations bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC