|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:47 PM Original message |
If repukes were smart: Why bother running someone against Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egalitariat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. They have to get her on the record committing to serve her 6 year term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Unopposed races bug the hell out of me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Pukes have money to burn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Yes. 8 billion missing from the CPA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Having someone to run against Clinton brings out the party faithful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes. Someone who's a pushover. That will add to the chances she's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safi0 (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. All they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. Can you imagine explaining to their followers why they didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beer Snob-50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. it would be stupid to not run someone against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Or conversely, no difficult runs for office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because if she doesn't have to raise money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. why are you embracing $$$$$ to prove a candidates worthiness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC