Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

wow. VERY interesting new Fineman article.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:19 PM
Original message
wow. VERY interesting new Fineman article.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10561966/from/RS.1/

"Spying, the Constitution — and the ‘I-word’
2006 will offer up Nixon-era nastiness and a chorus of calls to impeach Bush

WASHINGTON - In the first weeks and months after 9/11, I am told by a very good source, there was a lot of wishing out loud in the White House Situation Room about expanding the National Security Agency’s ability to instantly monitor phone calls and e-mails between American callers and possible terror suspects abroad. “We talked a lot about how useful that would be,” said this source, who was “in the room” in the critical period after the attacks.

Well, as the world now knows, the NSA — at the prompting of Vice President Cheney and on official (secret) orders from President Bush — was doing just that. And yet, as I understand it, many of the people in the White House’s own Situation Room — including leaders of the national security adviser’s top staff and officials of the FBI — had no idea that it was happening.

As best I can tell — and this really isn’t my beat — the only people who knew about the NSA’s new (and now so controversial) warrant-less eavesdropping program early on were Bush, Cheney, NSA chief Michael Hayden, his top deputies, top leaders of the CIA, and lawyers at the Justice Department and the White House counsel’s office hurriedly called in to sprinkle holy water on it."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. They also have a Live Vote as to whether B should be impeached
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 04:25 PM by Bumblebee
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/

attached to the article. Right now: 82% yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Done 83% yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oh My.....am I dreaming?.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Even though they
stretched the "no" options the pro-impeachment people are making an astounding statement. Thanks for the poll post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. 88% yes with 25,086 votes as of 1735 PST.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Much more talk of impeachment in 2006 . . ."
Bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Done,
and thanks for bringing this up.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Done.
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial.
83%

No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors."
7%

No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching.
8%

I don't know.
2%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Interesting phrasing of that first choice -
an abbreviated laundry list, meant to conjure up all of *'s transgressions.

MSRNC is *'s most loyal propaganda outlet, and Fineman his most loyal whore. This is fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Done
When a ho like fineman puts out a column like this, you know things have begun too turn around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Gack, Howie is SUCH a whore, though. He thinks that holding a President
accountable for flagrantly violating the 4th Amendment is partisan "Nixon-era nastiness"?!?!

Screw you, Howie. All members of Congress took an oath to uphold the Constitution - and they need to do so. NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick!
The "I" word is in the air!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. I just checked, they are up to 88%. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Done
89% !!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Did he forget Dr. Condi - she was head of the NSA at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fineman says the next year will be both sides accusing other of treason
Well, that's a switch, as repugs have been accusing the dems of treason for years, or if not treason, of wanting americans to die, lose wars, have a recession.

But the repug lies dont' mean that in fact treason never happens.

Sometimes, somebody really does act like a tyrant and sometimes somebody really does take a shit on the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "Nixon 2.0" I guess.
It's not entirely fair to Nixon. "Louis 16th 2.0" is a little obscure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. And this is good:
The president says that his highest duty is to protect the American people and our homeland. And it is true that, as commander-in-chief, he has sweeping powers to, as his oath says, “faithfully execute the office” of president. But the entity he swore to “preserve, protect and defend” isn’t the homeland per se — but the Constitution itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pick your "I" word: Impeach, Immoral, Illegal, Illogical, Incompetent
I've got a dictionary full of them.

So many "I" words, so little time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Not to mention Insane (n/t}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Don't forget to vote the article itself up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Ha ha! Check out the poll on the page if you scroll down to live vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. 88% vote to impeach on the NBC link 6:30 pm EST.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush lied us into war a "theory?!"

They used to demand this on the strength of the WMD issue, on the theory that the president had “lied us into war.”

What will it take to wake up these card-carrying apologists for Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hey kids, "it's impeachment."
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 08:45 PM by autorank
:nuke:

He's done, stick a fork in him. I've been totally involved in some local politics and have just emerge into this story. I heard it of course but didn't realize the visceral reaction. Even paleo conservatives are quick to point out it's time to talk about impeachment.

The Fineman piece is chilling...nobody knew. BULL SHIT!!! I'm not in national security, I'm not in law enforcement, but I am awake and I read the papers now and then and internet sources more. I KNEW NSA DID THIS BECAUSE I FUCKING READ THE NEWS.

What is Fineman up to? I'm actually curious right now. Why would he tell such a blatant lie?

I'd love to know. That explains who is jumping ship with the excuse, "I didn't know that."

My lord, their parents would be shocked at the blatant lies. Straingt to bed, no dinner.

Montana500, how is all this playing in my favorite Democratic contrnolled executive and legislative State anywhere...and how is Schweitzer responding or the other wise folks out there?

EXCELLENT POST. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. still up to 88%
9:45pm

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Still 88% for impeachment at 11:30. Bring it on!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Done! 88% for impeaching the Moron-in-chief.
The "I" word was all over the cable channels today. Shades of Richard Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. 88 % (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
29. The resounding 88% indicates America has had enough.
I sure have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I hope so, AtomicKitten
wiretapping without warrants is egregious and so against everything America is supposed to stand for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC