Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US wary of china. Moving nuke subs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:12 PM
Original message
US wary of china. Moving nuke subs.
Nuclear sub force to nearly double

Shift from Atlantic will bring 3 here

By Otto Kreisher
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
and Steve Liewer
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

February 28, 2006

The nuclear attack-submarine force in San Diego will nearly double within four years, the Navy said yesterday.

Six submarines will move from the East Coast to the Pacific Fleet, the Navy said in a statement. Three will come to San Diego.

The shifts reflect a recently released defense analysis calling for an increased naval presence in the Pacific. The report, called the Quadrennial Defense Review, recommended that Navy officials place 60 percent of their submarine force in the Pacific, partly because of wariness over China's rapidly expanding naval force.

Attack submarines form the backbone of the Navy's underwater fleet. They are capable of launching torpedoes and Tomahawk cruise missiles, according to the military Web site globalsecurity.org. They can deploy special operations forces, lay mines, strike land-based targets and battle enemy subs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoMercy Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Careful!! Chinese Gov -Owned companies manage large % of Port
facilities on the West Coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Groton Would Lose Three Subs Under Navy Plan
Majority Of Attack Subs Would Go To The Pacific
By Anthony Cronin

The Navy is proposing to move three submarines from the Naval Submarine Base in Groton to the West Coast over the next four years to meet increasing sub-related needs in the Pacific Rim region.

Navy officials have briefed congressmen from the states affected by the sub plan, which calls for 60 percent of the nation's nuclear-attack submarines to be committed to the Pacific region by 2010. The Navy plan envisions a 52-sub fleet in four years, with 21 attack submarines stationed at either the Groton base or Norfolk, Va., and the remaining 31 subs stationed at Pacific ports ranging from San Diego to Pearl Harbor and Guam.

A Navy official who requested anonymity said Monday that the planned 60-40 percent split in submarines committed to the Pacific and Atlantic oceans is consistent with the views expressed in the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review, which was released earlier this month and serves as the Pentagon's comprehensive report on its future defense needs.

The defense report advocates boosting both aircraft carrier and submarine presence in the Pacific Ocean because of growing global commerce in that region, as well as threats to national security. Congress mandates that the so-called QDR be completed every four years.

The Navy currently has a fleet of 53 attack submarines, 28 of which are stationed at its two East Coast bases in Groton and Norfolk. Twenty-five subs are spread across Pacific bases in Bangor, Wash.; San Diego; Pearl Harbor; and Guam.

The Navy official said the proposed redeployment of some submarines also reflects the Navy's shift from a “one size fits all” notion of deterrence to one that is more tailor-made to today's global needs and threats from military competitors and terrorist networks.

Under the plans disclosed to congressmen, the Groton base's fleet of 17 would be reduced by three, to 14 submarines by 2010. The Norfolk attack-sub fleet would be downsized from 11 to seven submarines –– meaning the current 28-sub Atlantic force would be reduced to 21 subs.
http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=5442cfde-9256-41f7-b95e-90a0955ff3eb">Continued here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC