Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Clinton and Murray vow to block FDA Chief Nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:38 PM
Original message
Senators Clinton and Murray vow to block FDA Chief Nominee
March 15, 2006
Bush Selects Nominee for F.D.A. Chief
By GARDINER HARRIS
http://tinyurl.com/g6vs7

WASHINGTON, March 15 — President Bush nominated Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach today to serve as commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, but a spat over the "morning-after" pill all but ensures that the nomination will go nowhere for months or even years.

A Bush family friend, Dr. von Eschenbach has led the F.D.A. since September, when his predecessor abruptly resigned. He also leads the National Cancer Institute.

Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Patty Murray have vowed to block any vote on Dr. von Eschenbach's nomination until the F.D.A. decides whether to allow over-the-counter sales of Plan B, an emergency contraceptive known as the "morning-after" pill.

The application has been pending for three years. Anti-abortion groups oppose the application; abortion advocates support it.

"If they don't come to a decision on Plan B, the White House is going to need a Plan C on their nominee," said Ms. Murray, a Democrat from Washington State.

The fight comes as the F.D.A. faces difficult decisions about how to track the safety of drugs and medical devices after approval, how to balance competing demands between speedier access to drugs and more information about their safety, and how to approve generic versions of expensive biotech drugs.

Some agency observers say that only a confirmed commissioner can make such decisions. Political observers nonetheless predict a stalemate.

Norman J. Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, said that the Bush administration would allow Dr. von Eschenbach's nomination to languish for years before doing anything that would anger its allies in the anti-abortion movement, as an approval for Plan B would.

"It's not a contest," Mr. Ornstein said. "With the president's approval rating down even among Republicans, they are not going to enrage their base."

(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hurry and try to change the subject Hillary!
Hurry! Hurry! Hurry! You can't outrun the censure boogey man! It is here and it is hungry for your campaign contributions. You can call it "RussZilla" if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Senator Clinton has threatened to do this for years
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 07:51 PM by wiley
The nomination was just announced. Give me a break! Isn't there some CORRUPT REPUBLICAN you could harass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm seeing a trend. Kerry is refusing to approve of the guy
who was in charge of 'the big dig' in Boston for some transportation position (?), Byrd is refusing to approve a man who's been nominated to take over the mine admin, these are three dimson appointees.
Hmmm, very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think this is the only real power that a minority Party
in the Senate has to block nominees. They put a hold on them, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I 'think' so; w/these disapprovals, the selectees won't get put
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 07:57 PM by babylonsister
through, at least immediately, though I'm not well-versed on this at all. But I do recall those other 2 senators disagreeing about the nominees.
Maybe someone else has more/better info.

Edit to add:

http://famulus.msnbc.com/famulusgen/ap03-14-162540.asp?...

Kerry to put hold on Bush nomination for top highway job

By LESLIE MILLER
ASSOCIATED PRESS


WASHINGTON, March 14 — Former presidential candidate John Kerry said Tuesday he will prevent the former head of Boston's $14.6 billion Big Dig, Richard Capka, from becoming head of the Federal Highway Administration.


''I'm afraid Richard Capka could be the Brownie of highways,'' Kerry said, referring to former Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown, who became the scapegoat for the inept federal response to Hurricane Katrina.

Capka, nominated earlier this month by President Bush for the top highway job, was chief executive officer of the Boston highway project from January 2001 to June 2002 until his position was terminated.

Though costs rose slightly during his 1½-year tenure, Capka was mostly criticized for his failure to handle the political controversies surrounding the massive project. For example, he approved lucrative severance packages for several Big Dig lawyers.

Sen. Kerry, D-Mass., said he will place a hold on Capka's nomination, which would prevent the Senate from considering his nomination.

''Why on earth would he get a promotion?'' Kerry said. ''It looks like the administration is going to repeat a stunning pattern of rewarding people who screw up.''

and

West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd is blocking the confirmation of the person President Bush has picked to oversee U.S. mine safety. Byrd, a Democrat, said Tuesday he needs more assurances that Richard Stickler will be a strong leader at the Mine Safety and Health Administration, especially in light of accidents that have left 24 miners dead this year.

Byrd said he is trying to meet with Stickler, who previously headed Pennsylvania's mine safety agency and also worked as an industry executive. ''MSHA's political leadership seems to have lost sight in recent years that miners' safety and health is that agency's top priority,'' Byrd said. ''Until I know that Mr. Stickler will make safety job No. 1 at MSHA, I will not allow his nomination to move forward.''

Byrd said he wants to learn more about Stickler's views on key issues, including the need for better communications devices and a more aggressive fine structure. Under Senate rules, any single senator can block nominations or legislation. In response to questions from The Associated Press, Byrd acknowledged he was blocking the nomination.

Stickler faced tough questioning from senators during his confirmation hearing earlier this year, shortly after 14 miners were killed in two accidents at the Sago and Alma No. 1 mines in West Virginia. Stickler and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., disagreed over whether a mine rescue team should be required at every underground coal mine. Kennedy said the current policy allowing teams to be two hours away isn't sufficient, but Stickler said requiring each coal mine to have a team on hand isn't realistic.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Mine-Admini...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nice. "The Brownie of Highways"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I & C
Highway nominee is incompetent.

FDA guy is a crony.

What else is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC