Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Operation Swarmer: Prime Propaganda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:00 PM
Original message
Operation Swarmer: Prime Propaganda

In the wake of a tremendously expensive air assault in a region where news reporting suffers greater restrictions then before, media must now evaluate its role in an ongoing propaganda campaign.





Is this an attempt to cover up all those mysterious civilian casualties recently discovered under questionable circumstances? That wispy TV news report vanished like smoke during this attack and I can't find it online.

Is it an effort to suppress reports that we've spent thousands of lives and nearly three years to the day in a country, only to leave it without infrastructure or peace, as they embark on a lengthy civil war? In a region where the U.S. not only holds air but also ground supremacy the Swarmer raid, according to many broadcasters, appears political.

Is this newest flight of insanity designed to take attantion away from polls or tensions in America, like the march from Mobile to New Orleans by Vietnam Veterans Against War and Cindy Sheehan?


Earlier in this week's offensive, six munitions caches have been uncovered, along with bomb-making equipment and medical supplies, military officials said. More than 30 people are being held following the raids. An official, according to another CNN story, said up to 100 insurgents may be operating in the area, which has a population of about 1,500.

The Pentagon says Operation Swarmer is the largest U.S. military air assault in Iraq since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. ANY respectable police force regularly rounds up a mere 31 suspects with far less expense than this costly endeavor and Iraq is riddled with "bomb-making equipment" these days.

Friday, March 17, 2006; Posted: 10:07 a.m. EST (15:07 GMT)

Editor's note: One of CNN's Iraqi producers writes about the atmosphere in Iraq three years after March 20, 2003, the start of the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. The name of the writer has been withheld due to security concerns.
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Every day when I wake up in the morning, before having breakfast, I call my two married sisters who live in different neighborhoods. I call them for one simple reason: To make sure they're OK.

"We heard some explosions and gunfire yesterday night but we are all fine, how about you?" my older sister asked me the other day over the phone.

I live with my parents in northern Baghdad, in a mixed neighborhood of Sunnis and Shiites. We've lived in this neighborhood for 15 years, side by side, Sunnis, Shiites and some Kurds. Before, we didn't know who was a Sunni, who was a Shiite. Now, it seems it's all we know.

Everyone in my family has a mobile phone. This way we can always be in touch. Always check in with each other. It's essential because nobody can ever predict what's going to happen on any given day in Iraq. When I leave in the morning, I never know if we will all be back at home that night.

To get to work, it takes 15 minutes from my house, but that's on a good day. There is almost always traffic, convoys and checkpoints.

But that isn't the worst part. Instead, the bigger fear is roadside bombs, car bombs and suicide bombs that explode -- many times targeting U.S. and Iraqi forces, but instead killing civilians. And then there are the insurgent attacks on government convoys and drive-by shootings that leave innocent bystanders dead or wounded.

I usually get a ride to work from my younger brother. But on days when I'm worried about attacks, I find my own way. If something happens, I don't want my brother to get hurt. In those cases, I usually take the bus. Not the easiest way to get to work, but the other day it gave me a chance to find out what is going through other Iraqis' minds.
Was it better under Saddam?

As I rode on the bus, most people started out quiet, but within minutes the silence was broken.

"Look! I cannot believe this could happen to us," an old man said pointing his finger at a line of cars that stretched for more than a kilometer outside a gas station -- amazed that an oil-rich country is dealing with an oil crisis for its own people.

"Habibi (my dear), our oil is being stolen by the Americans and the new Iraqi government. What oil are you talking about?" another man replied.

It's not a view shared by most in Iraq, but it is a view that some hold.

Across the aisle, an old woman who sat quietly listening to the exchange in a simple manner brought the debate to an end. "We do not want anything but to live in Iraq safely."

Iraqis often speak of fuel shortages, a lack of electricity, the void in stability, all the things that deeply affect their daily life. Some also speak of the past.

"Life was much better under Saddam," one man said from the back of the bus.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/03/17/iraq.main/ http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/03/17/iraq.anniversary/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Life was much better under Saddam,"
That says it all. $300BB and 30,000 dead and maimed American soldiers wasted for a Republican disaster that none of us wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. as I said earlier, it's ALL nothing but waste
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 02:19 PM by Jeffersons Ghost
wasted lives and money are hallmarks of this Republican military fiasco. In a city of ANY size, 31 arrests in a day is typical and unlike in Iraq, U.S. cops will have the evidence to convict them in court. I bet 1/1,000th of the Iraq War budget would truly help American police forces combat terrorism and violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would any self respecting news org,
use propaganda footage from the military? Not allowing the press to report on the mission, just tells me they're afraid of how the Iraqi troops will perform. I just sit here and shake my head, and try and figure a way to stop the madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. that's a good point rufus
Certainly that is one of the reasons for shutting out the media... Also, having control over when combat footage is released in the future will have advantages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Hi Ghost
Here a link to what this things really about, the MSM should be talking about this.

http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/03/operation_...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. hey rufus
:hi: you might want to fix that link... Did you see above where the Iraqi said,
"Life was much better under Saddam," one man said from the back of the bus. I bet in America we'll be saying "Life was much better before bushie threw us UNDER a bus."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. That's funny,
To bad it's so hard to laugh. It's hard to remember what life was like in america before Bu$h, it's been a long hard six years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Operation Swarmer is the largest U.S. military air assault in Iraq since
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 02:25 PM by file83
2003"

That is saying a lot about how many bombs they dropped. Holy crap! Interesting too, if the occupation is going so well, then why the need for ESCULATING tactics? Things are obviously going downhill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. By "Air Assault", they do not mean bombing.
"Air Assault" for the Army means delivering troops to their attack area by helicopter, usually by rappelling.

I think the "largest air assault" line was a deliberate attempt to mislead the media. Very little bombing was actually done yesterday. They only moved less than 1000 soldiers from the 101st division, just enough to make it a large "air assault".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My bad. Likewise, it wasn't 1000 American soldiers, it was...
...as Maj. Tom Bryant, spokesman for the 101st said:

On Friday, about 900 U.S. and Iraqi troops were engaged in Operation Swarmer, said Maj. Tom Bryant, a spokesman for the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division.

<snip>

Bryant said Iraqi troops slightly outnumber U.S. forces.

So if Iraqi troops slightly outnumber U.S. forces, that means the American troop numbers would be less than HALF of 900. To be generous, one could say that American troop numbers were 450. I wonder if that is still considered a "large" air assault? I have no idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Only "largest since the start of the Iraq war"
and that because its pretty much the ONLY air assault since the start of the Iraq war.

So, 450 US troops. You can fit 12 on an Apache helicopter. Means about 40 helicopters transported US troops into this area. In the US this would be a small scale excercise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. that 101st has a rich tradition Alegro
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 03:46 PM by Jeffersons Ghost
They're a top Airborn force that saw lots of action in Nam. I think it was about 40 helocopters with no shots fired... It's all PR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Yup, I have some friends in that division right now
but I never was in that one. Did some time in 1st Cav, 1st Armored, and 2nd Infantry, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. maybe the administration wants to spend money faster
to get higher commissions, one must sell more product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. wait til the bill gets here for the permanent bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. current military action in Iraq is costing about $100,000 a minute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Heres the real story
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4817762.stm

It was billed by the US military as "the largest air assault operation" since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Attack and assault aircraft were providing "aerial weapons support" for 1,500 US and Iraqi commandos were moving in to clear "a suspected insurgent operating area north-east of Samarra".

In US military parlance, "air assault" means transporting troops into a combat zone by air - it could include, but does not necessarily imply, air strikes

"According to US joint doctrine, an air assault is one in which assault forces, using the mobility of rotary wing assets and total integration of available firepower, manoeuvre under the control of a ground or air manoeuvre commander to engage enemy forces or seize key terrain."

In this instance, key terrain may have been seized but no enemy forces were apparently engaged.

The operation came at a time when support at home for President Bush and his campaign in Iraq was running very low

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Might I add, that "air ass-alts" strike JUST AFTER MOST OF TARGET VAMOSES
unless target is civilian neighborhoods, thinking the occupiers have enough humanity to not bomb women & children & hospitals & power stations & sewer plants.
Only OIL platforms & refineries were off target lists of the U.S. death star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Operation Swarmer is a ruse!
Watched some highlights of the "major operation" on the local news. The reporter was saying little resistance was encountered.

Some military commander was giving a press conference and saying that "we found what we expected to find".

Troop levels for the operation have already been reduced and it's expected to wrap up in a few days.


Now, add in that NO independent media were allowed and the writing is on the wall:


The operation near Samarra was NOT about rounding up insurgents. It was touted as being Iraqi-led but it was US hardware being used. No resistance encountered but they found what they expected to find? I'm sure they did!


This is a PLOY! It's a RUSE!


The GOP and the M$M will now start touting this as PROOF that not only are the Iraqi security forces gaining ground in their training but that the insurgency is weakening and the US is WINNING!!


And this isn't the first time this administration played politics with military operations. The assault on Falluja was held off until a week after the general election in 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. excellent analysis
Roland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. It is either a ruse, a diversion from Bush's woes or a massacre.
Perhaps
E. All of the above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. "FREEDOM's ON THE MARCH"! now go away son, you're botherin me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. this "winning freedom for Iraq," rings of Nam.
Republicans are about to make all those deaths meaningless as they abandon the presidential position that Democracy will work in that country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Hi JG, I'm not on your "ignore" list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. no one is on my ignore list
While I'm certainly not calling you an enemy, I keep my friends close and my enemies closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. If one of the WH neo-cons would live in Baghdad, outside the green zone...
THEN and only then will I accept the propaganda that Iraq is better off, better off IN ANY WAY!!
I'll say it, Iraq was better off before, before the 2003 invasion and before the U.S. military occupation, from my perspective here in So. Cal. You military supporters have some soul searching to rationalize the 100,000 plus dead Iraqis and the 3000 plus admitted ally deaths. Shame on the war-profiteers, and shame on the black-hearted, lying neo-cons, and shame on their supporters.
This is a trajedy of the first order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. sounds like they were shooting a recruiting commercial for TV
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 06:29 PM by Neil Lisst
Operation Mid March Distraction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. which "March"
With all the world-wide Peace Marches going on now, I wonder which "March Distraction" you mean... I pick Cindy's


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Operation Smarmer, named in honor of their Commander in Chief:
The Master Smarmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC