Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Poppy, Carter & Nixon "plunged" lower than Junior in the polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:18 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Poppy, Carter & Nixon "plunged" lower than Junior in the polls


All of this bodes ill for the Republicans as midterm congressional elections approach this fall, although some Democratic strategists are concerned that the censure resolution and impeachment talk may actually make for an unwanted distraction. Registered voters continue to prefer Democratic candidates for Congress over GOP candidates by a margin of 50 percent to 39 percent.

This is the third of four NEWSWEEK polls taken since September 2005 showing the Democrats with a double-digit lead. The Democrats never had such an advantage in any NEWSWEEK poll conducted before the last two off-year Congressional elections, 2002 and 1998. The Democrats now lead in Congressional vote preferences of Independents by 47 percent to 31 percent. Key to the election outcome is whether the Democrats’ big advantage with independent voters will be maintained and how many of these voters will actually turn out in November.

Both houses of Congress are now controlled by the Republicans, but public opinion now favors a Democratic takeover this November by a margin of 50 percent to 34 percent. Among Independents, the Democrats are preferred by more than a two-to-one margin: 51 percent to 22 percent.

Low as Bush’s approval ratings are at the moment, three of the last six U.S. presidents actually had ratings below Bush’s current score at some point in their presidencies. His father, George H.W. Bush, saw his rating decline to 29 percent in August 1992, amid growing economic woes. Jimmy Carter slipped to 28 percent in July 1979 during the Iran hostage crisis, and Richard Nixon plunged to 23 percent in January 1974, the year he resigned his office as a result of the Watergate scandal.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11894249/site/newsweek/page/2/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Geeze. Did you have to include the pic?
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 08:21 PM by Sparkle
:puke:

p.s. what's with the bush eats beef screen name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:24 PM
Original message
When I joined DU...
...a "mad cow" story was active in the news.

Junior was in Crawford. He went before the cameras to fluff up his Texas rancher buddies by saying "I HAD BEEF FOR LUNCH TODAY."

Immediately after thinking "Who gives a flying fuck," I thought "This is the stupidest thing he's said to date."

And Bush_Eats_Beef was born. Some DUers wish on an ongoing basis that I'd drop dead. So far, I haven't.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Was that the speech when he also said --
"It's important for the Murcan people to eat," and "Thank goodness we're not dependent on somebody else's meat!"? I still remember that one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't remember...I just remember him standing next to bales of hay...
...looking like the Idiot-In-Chief.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, that was the one!!!
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 08:54 PM by Sparkly
It was hilarious. It was like an early experiment in allowing him out without a script!

Husb and I quote that one often. ("Thank goodness we aren't dependent on somebody else's _________!" is always useful -- you can fill in the blank with anything -- and still cracks us up!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. "Put food on your family!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Plunged" is the appropriate verb, and nice pic of the unhappy monkey. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Kerry was a lock in 2004. Damn dems better not take anything
for granted - its a street fight and they better get that through their thick skulls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Kerry was never a lock...
...no Democratic nominee was. Best we ever did in polling is within the MOE ahead, for brief spurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Agreed. Pre election polling was fairly neck and neck.
The month after the SBV"T" went on the attack, Bush lead by double digits in a few polls. Kerry rebounded after the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Also look at the numbers and put them in perspective
Carter and Bush 1 had incrediblely low approval ratings. Bush 1 in August 1992 was at 29%, his son in August 2004 was around 50%. Clinton did not win 1992 in a landslide and he had Perrot bashing Bush for most of the campaign.

There also was no war, no terror, and a freer media. There was a lot of voter suppression in 2004 that may or may not have quietly occured in 1992. Clinton also didn't have some people who still remembered that a previous Democrat had acted inappropriately in the WH.

Given that the media enabled the Republicans to slime his war service, his long public service career, his character, personality, his wife, and his marriage; it's amazing Kerry came so close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. will they promise that when jr gets to 23 percent he will quit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. That is the face of a very psychologically screwed up human being
(for lack of a better term) who looks to be on some kind of drug or drinking. The meanness and pettiness of the man just screams out. He is more and more out of control by the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think this guy has what it takes to plunge below any of
the others. There is no way to turn, no way to run. He will not get a brain transplant, nor will he develop a heart. He's just a tin chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. He has downward momentum
He has very few tricks left that he can use to improve his ratings. All of his bankrupt policies are catching up with him and he's not going to reverse any of them to improve the situation for average Americans.

He does still have the news media in control, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's true they did. What's Newsweek's point?
All 3 of those presidents were driven from office.

Nice company for Baby Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. We haven't reached the point in the MSM...
...where it's "OK" for Bush to crash and burn.

There's too much preoccupation with him having another 9-11 "bullhorn moment," or as Chris Matthews says, "regaining his sunny nobility."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redphish Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Looks like he needs some Ex-lax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. What glorious spin Newsweek has
Here are the unexposed facts.

Of the three previous Presidents who had lower ratings:

Bush I - 29% in Aug of 92, just two months before he lost re-election. The next election favored opponents.

Carter - 28% in July 79, during the Iran Hostage Crisis. He never recovered and lost re-election. The next election favored opponenets

Nixon - 23% in Jan 74, six months before becoming the first US President forced to resign. The next election favored opponents.

So, would you say Bush's deflated polls are not as bad as three previous presidents?

How about these:

Like Bush I, Carter and Nixon, Bush the Lesser's low polls are a harbinger of a losing election for Republicans.

Bush the Lesser has good company with other losing Presidents.

Like his predecessors, Bush edges closer to defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. give it a year

and Dubya will be fighting Nixon for the bottom.

You realize he loses ~12% of the electorate permanently per calendar year, I assume. This ride is only going to get better for us, and only worse for him and his boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have faith in the Boy King - I think he can beat them all
He will one day win the title of most hated American politician by the greatest number of people.

Lord knows he's made the grade in my heart already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. "at some point in their presidencies"
Let's see the average ratings, assholes.

Least Popular President EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. "All of this bodes ill
for the Republicans as midterm congressional elections approach this fall, although some Democratic strategists are concerned that the censure resolution and impeachment talk may actually make for an unwanted distraction."

Once again, the MSM has to throw in some jab against our side, citing some vague, unnamed "strategists". They're still serving their corporate masters as the ship is sinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Poppy and President Carter never HAD second terms....
.....and the ONLY president in the last 60+ years to be lower than our Village Idiot is "I'm not a crook" Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. The difference is Brain Cells

All of the others possessed an IQ over 110 ~ the Chimp's IQ is about the same as his ratings, in the low 30's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC