Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Democratic strategists simply must go. Kick them out.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:16 AM
Original message
Why the Democratic strategists simply must go. Kick them out.
I found this article after reading about "Mudcat" Saunders at Kos. He absolutely loves the word "Bubba", and he is filled with ways to appeal to all the "Bubbas" everywhere. He is a strategist for some of the Virginia candidates. I find his name annoying, and he needs to lose the word "Bubba." It is insulting.

And the remarks made by Carville and Begala about late-term abortion are just overboard. I think they need to research a little. Too many strategists afraid of losing their income, I guess, as the grassroots exert more power over the party's agenda.

Advice for Democrats: Find new focus, stop wonking

Go south, and go rural.

In a salty new book, 'Foxes in the Henhouse," Steve Jarding and Dave "Mudcat" Saunders rip Kerry and their own party for essentially ignoring what they label as "Bubba" voters in 2004. Many but not all Bubbas live in the South and in rural areas all over the country, and together they represent the linchpin to a winning Democratic coalition, said the two Democratic strategists, who may line up with ex-Virginia Gov. Mark Warner if he runs for president in 2008.

Jarding and Saunders spiritedly distinguish between "Bubba" and "redneck," saying most Democratic leaders don't understand the difference. And they argue that Democrats can win back Bubbas through economic populism and a culturally moderate message.

"Bubba stands for a blue-collar outlook that transcends gender, color, economic and geographical bounds," Saunders and Jarding wrote. "Bubba-spirited females are common throughout America, and as Jesse Jackson will tell you, in the rural South, black Bubbas are also very common."


Note to Mudcat and Jarding: Lose the words Bubba and Redneck. Choose other words to refer to people in the South. Some take it personally when they find out you are doing it.

And the stance of Begala and Carville on abortion, late-term, shows they are totally unaware of what it is.

Rethink the party's rigid stance on abortion rights.

Former Bill Clinton advisers Paul Begala and James Carville argue in their book "Take it Back" that while most Americans support a right to a legal abortion, many also oppose the late-term procedure often labeled "partial birth abortion." Yet all eight Democrats who ran for president in '04 opposed a ban on the procedure, Carville and Begala wrote. "That is the very definition of extremism," they wrote.


As Governor Dean explained, and most doctors and women understand, an abortion that must be performed late in a pregnancy is one which involves a women's life....her right to choose her life over dying..a choice between her and her doctor.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. The only PBA's I've ever known of
were those that determined that the last trimester would result in the death of the child or mother. The one I am most familiar with was a fetus who had only one heart chamber and could not survive the birthing process. To tell the mother she must deliver a dead child is beyond the realm of decency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's a "culturally moderate message"?
"We only sorta hate gays"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. How about opposing partial birth abortions, except
when the life of health of the mother is in danger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. That's like saying
I oppose unemployment insurance except for those who don't have jobs.

THAT'S THE ONLY TIME THEY'RE DONE!!!!!! AND YOU BET I'M YELLING!!!!!

I'm yelling because it sure as hell seems to me the MEN who consider themselves on the Left could goddamned well learn a little bit about the goddamned ISSUES that affect women in this country in a way as viscerally important as sovereign rights over their own bodies.

Your question doesn't even pass the Common Sense Test: What MEDICAL DOCTOR would perform an abortion on a perfectly healthy, VIABLE fetus in the 3rd Trimester??!! Only a Dr. Mengele, and only on those he considered "subhumans" anyway.

These late term abortions are ONLY done in the very worst cases, where the fetus is incapable of living once born, and almost always the situation is compromising the mother's health and often her very life. They are tragedies for all involved, not some kind of abortions at whim.

And what a low (misogynist) opinion you have of ALL women, revealed by your underlying premise that there are women who would seriously consider this for a perfectly healthy, otherwise perfectly viable fetus. Aaargh.

MEN: Get out of your white male privilege-induced self-absorbed little worlds and EDUCATE YOURSELVES about the issues facing the OTHER half of the human race. Please. Someday these issues will affect someone YOU love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, we do need to go rural,
but rural doesn't necessarily mean anti-choice and redneck.

Just yesterday I posted that the reason Republicans have fared so well in the South and the mid-West isn't because of racism or sexism or Godism or gunism, it's because Republicans don't openly look down their snouts at us. (I know that some probably still do, but they don't in public). They've embraced the slight difference in cultures and, after decades of Hollywood treating all Southerners as though we're backwards and inbred (we're no more so than the rest of the country, believe me) the Republicans gave the rural voters a sense of pride in the fact that we say, "Y'all" and we drawl and some of us eat hog jowl and collard greens and some of us live our lives a bit slower.

So, yes, the Democrats would do well to speak to the cultural divide by embracing the differences - and there are many that don't have a damn thing to do with race or sex. What Dems need to do to make inroads into the rural South and mid-West - and we do need to do that to win a national election - is to actual campaign in these areas and take a populist message to these voters: a message that moves away from corporate control and outsourcing and we need a strong person who won't be seen as a wimp on national defense.

It's not that difficult, really, and no one needs to stoop down to call folks "Bubba" and pretend the whole region is anti-choice or racist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. this might be a shot in the dark, but ...
maybe there are issues that concern rural communities and there is a track record of Dems doing better for them than Republicans.

I am really thinking of other issues that I am more familiar with like: balancing the budget, lowering the national debt, not handing out no-bid contracts for cronies and the like. I'd be surprised if the republicans suddenly become honest and competent as soon as they leave city limits.

Unfortuntely it's way outside my direct experience but perhaps it is worth checking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. I've been saying this for several (almost 5, now) years....
Carville and Begala need to be the first to be hogtied with their mouths duct-taped, and shoved into a locked closet, with the key then thrown away.

Democratic "strategists" -- the lot of them -- need to go and go NOW. K Street needs to be burned to the ground, fumigated, and paved over for good.

Eeeeeeeee-yuck! Get rid of this vermin!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. In total agreement with you.
but so many people even here think the opposite, which is why we are in this predicament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's more like a handful of people
with a lot of time on their hands and a blind trust in anything with a D attached to it.

The bulk of us want the Donna Brasilles to take a permanent vacation from politics. They can go "consult" for the corporations they ostenbily work for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Considering that "Mudcat" is working for a Swift Liars enabler,
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 08:26 AM by MH1
I don't appreciate too much he has to say about Kerry's 2004 campaign - or anything else.

I agree with your take on "Bubba", too.

(edited to clarify - premature posting problem this morning. ;-) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. I agree
The Dem strategists need to go. I just posted in another thread about my anger that Emmanuel is waiting until August to release a Dem plan. So the Reps have a more months to trash Dems about not having a plan. We wouldn't want to interfere with the Rep spin, afterall. :sarcasm: Referring to folks as Bubbas is insulting and demeaning. Allowing women to die to cave into RW spin on late term abortion is immoral. I'm so angry right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. IMO, partisanship should deal with Wealth and Power issues
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 11:50 AM by Armstead
A core of the Democratic Dilemma is that they have allowed partisan politics to shift from the core issues related to Wealth and Power and instead allowed themselves to become associated with lifestyle issues. This has diluted their ability (or willingness) to win over people who should be instinctually Democrats. The trditional Democratic Coalition was very broadly based, from "Northern Intellectuals" to socially-conservative but economically-progressive blue collar voters.

In a true "big tent" coalition, there are going to be differenes on the issues that are seperate from the core unifying principles. What I'm saying is that the core unifying principle for Democrats should be matters that relate to Wealth and Power.

My belief is that the Democrats as a party shouod focus on isues of Wealth and Power from a clearly liberal and progressive standpoint, and sell that to the so-called "Bubbas."

With the exception of a truly boneheded minority, THAT is what would bring the Democrats support and votes. A coialition based on HONEST PROGRESSIVE POPULISM on issues like corporate control, workers' rights, survival of the middle class, the need to preserve a domestic economy, universal access to affoirdable healthcare, etc.

The social issues should be left to the individual beliefs of candidates, based on their own beliefs and those of their constituiencies. IMO, it is more likely that a liberal position on most social issues would also be a winner, because most Americans ultimately have an attitude of "Live and Let Live" combined with "Keep your nose out of my personal life." So they would tend to be more pro-choice, against intrusive government surveillane, the imposition of Bible Laws through the state, etc.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Mudcat's bedspread...is this true or satire?
I don't trust Weekly Standard, but it was an interview supposedly. This part made me rather sick inside. I have many ancestors who fought with the South in the Civil War, but I don't feel the need for a bedspread about it. Maybe this is clever satire, the whole thing...and I am missing something.

"When Howard Dean stepped in it, during the run-up to primary season 2004, by suggesting that his party needed to appeal to guys who have Confederate-flag decals on their pickup trucks, Mudcat was his target demographic. Mudcat's bedspread is a large Confederate flag, which he pedantically insists is the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia. The rest of the Confederacy appropriated it, he says, because it was Virginians like J.E.B. Stuart and Stonewall Jackson who "did most of the ass-kicking."

Since his own great-grandfather got his shoulder blown out by a yankee at Seven Pines, Mudcat is a proud member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. But he wants it made absolutely clear that his celebration of heritage doesn't mean he's some racist--a common misconception, he says, which is why his fellow Democrats reacted to Dean as though he'd advocated electrocuting puppies."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5716&R=C80C3F5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree with your take 100% on this. These guys don't see that the biggest
problem the Dems face is that since 1997, the GOP has been in near total control of broadcast media.

WHY? Because they are the beneficiaries of the corporate media that lines their pockets, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unbelievable
"Bubba"??? He calls southerners, midwesterners, and blue-collar people "Bubba"?? And then has the audacity to wonder why the fuck said blue-collar people think "Democrats" look DOWN on them?

NOTE TO "STRATEGISTS": You will NEVER win the vote of people you condescend to. EVER. Carville and Begala need to be strung up and thrown out into the street. "Partial birth abortion" is a make-believe bogeyman created by the right to scare average Americans into thinking that abortion kills living, breathing, crying, cuddly newborn babies. It's as despicable and false a tactic as Reagan's racially-charged "welfare queen" crap in the 80s meant to convince people that their taxmoney was subsidizing some lazy unemployed black woman in Harlem who had six kids by six different fathers.

I think I'll not listen to any of their lamebrained "critiques" of 2004 - they all should have been put out to pasture eight years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Dems simply need to be forthright about their positions.
... instead of having them reek of being concocted in the kitchen by handlers.

Having transcribed surgery reports for 30 years in California, I have never, as in ever, come across a "late term abortion" procedure. The rarity of these procedures and the conditions under which they might occur must be clarified by the Dems; they certainly are not done "on request." That is a more potent argument than the slippery slope meme.

Part of the problem with Democrats is that they simply do not give a clear, concise message.

They need to start hammering the crimes of BushCo, the lies, the obstruction of justice, the purposeful lack of oversight by the Republican Congress. Clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. When did "Bubba" become an insult?
It's a pretty common name in these parts, both for men and dogs.

(I hope that didn't cause anyone to spit their latte out on their keyboard! :sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. I agree with you, MF (no pun intended), on both issues
Both as to the "PBA" and "Bubba." As a Southerner, I find the term "Bubba" very condescending and downright insulting. It just makes me cringe. We'll never win voters who think that we think we're better than they are.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. There is only one strategy that will work.
Expose the republican lies and tell the truth. Anything else is REPUBLICAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC