Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quick Question: Weren't we a "Nation at War" when Clinton was Impeached???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:00 PM
Original message
Quick Question: Weren't we a "Nation at War" when Clinton was Impeached???
Memory is a bit fuzzy, but seems like we were in the middle of a war in Bosnia and Kosovo, not to mention bombing the hell out of Iraq at the time the Repukes were calling for Clinton's impeachment and resignation and imprisonment and execution and the rest of it.

Was all that just a bad dream?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's funny,
I had that same bad dream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. Its just one more example of how Republicans are TRAITORS
to America and everything it stands for -- did you doubt it? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. it just seems to me, that these bush bot bastards have not been
reminded of this fact, calling Senator Feingold a traitor for introducing a resolution for Censure seems rather extreme hypocrisy to me... but maybe i'm misremembering the facts?


If i am remember things correctly, why the hell doesn't any of the Dems come out and remind these bush bot fascists of these facts, or least remind the media!

maybe i'm making it all up, and it never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. just want someone to respond to the bush bots on this point...
it's so freaking rediculous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quisp Donating Member (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. yep, they were traitors before being traitorous was cool... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well yeah but that was when the president had a (D). All is different
when the president has an (R).


Even the US Constitution, US laws, international laws, Geneva Conventions, torture, gulags...everything's ok when the president has an (R).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. That's right, I thought everyone knew that.
Laws are only count when they benefit the Republicans.

It's all in the fine print, get a magnifying glass or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. when have we ever not been at war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. good point...
i'm trying to remember... Carter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. well let's see

If you count the cold war that would be a no right there.

But we might also want to consider his and Zbig's involvement in training
islamic fundamentalists to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

Carter has a relatively good record compared to most though. He stopped U.S.
support for the Samoza dictatorship (a big plus in my mind).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. hmm..
My history under Carter years is unfortunately void of any in depth background knowledge - i simply wasn't paying attention to much except for the Camp David Peace Accords and then of course the Iran hostage situation.. not to mention the terrible bashing he got for the "double digit" inflation and high unemloyment numbers which i think was a result of the cost of the Viet Nam wars.

But to his credit, he didn't start the Cold War.. I have recently heard it argued that he had more to do with "ending" the cold war than he's been give credit for. I don't know why i wasn't up on the Afghanistan war, i thought it was Reagan who was backing the Taliban against the Soviet Union?









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. oh, I'm not blaming Carter for the Cold War or anything

don't get me wrong.

As well, I think too many people view U.S. history with the idea that every administration starts anew in terms of foreign policy. That is not the case though. There are groups like the CFR and the NSC that are filled with the same people no matter who is president and the, in a large part, determine U.S. foreign policy.

BTW, the Taliban didn't take over until 1996. They won out over all the other warlords who competed for power after the Soviet Union left and Bush Sr. walked away from it all. It was the Muhajadeen that I believe you are referring to. Most of this effort occurred under Reagan but I think it got started at the very end of the Carter administration. It went full scale once Reaganstein took over.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The USA is not at "War".
The USA is in Occupation mode in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Iraq: Permanent US Colony”

Iraq: Permanent US Colony
By Dahr Jamail

t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Tuesday 14 March 2006

“Why does the Bush Administration refuse to discuss withdrawing occupation forces from Iraq? Why is Halliburton, who landed the no-bid contracts to construct and maintain US military bases in Iraq, posting higher profits than ever before in its 86-year history?
Why do these bases in Iraq resemble self-contained cities as much as military outposts?”

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031306A.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree but it is murdering people like crazy, tantamount IMHO
and it has been for the last 200 years

I meant war in a very broad sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. We are still engaged in War Fare...Technicality notwithstanding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. omg.. i meant the muhajadeen - my bad
i can't believe i did that! - we are subjected to so much revisionism in vis a vis the media, apparently that piece got stuck. (sheesh!)

On the matter of the Foreign Policy set by the CFR...

If only more DU'rs were aware of how much of U.S. Foreign Policy is crafted, guided, and driven by this group (working closely with NSA)with every single administration, regardless of which party is in the white house.

Thanks for the reminder on Afghanistan. A lot of imortant history, much of it muddied in the fog of wars, and propaganda..









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC