Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diminishing Marginal Outrage...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:58 AM
Original message
Diminishing Marginal Outrage...
Fed up?

Diminishing Marginal Outrage?
June 01, 2006

Robert Scheer wants to know why the media is mostly ignoring connections between George Bush and Enron, particularly connections to Ken Lay:

Kenny Boy's Connections, by Robert Scheer, The Nation: The Bush Family consistently acted to put Enron and its longtime CEO Ken Lay into a position to rip off investors and taxpayers. Why is the mass media ignoring that fact now that Lay has been convicted in arguably the most egregious example of white-collar fraud in US history?

Until he hooked up with the Bushes, Lay was just another mid-level energy trader complaining endlessly about being hemmed in by onerous government regulations and those terrible consumer lawyers who prevent free market hustlers from doing their thing. But after he and his company became top supporters of the Bushes--eventually giving $3 million combined to various Bush electoral campaigns and the Republican Party--doors opened for them in a big way. In particular, once Bush the father got rid of key energy industry regulations, Lay was a made man and Enron's fortunes soared...

...

...
I'm finding I am subject to diminishing marginal outrage, and maybe I'm not alone. It's hard to get worked up about every potential scandal when there are so many. There are revelations about this administration almost daily it seems at times that would have been huge news during the Clinton years. Because the events were relatively isolated under Clinton, each was the subject of intense focus. But now, with the number of potential scandals multiplying so fast as time passes, the added news value of each new bit of information is diminished and much of it passes by with barely a squeak from the press.


So very true... In addition to being a case of diminishing marginal outrage, it may even be outright "Outrage Fatigue"... I know I'm tired unto exhaustion just trying to comprehend how many, and how egregious, the multitude of Bush crimes have been.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media shouldn't be susceptible to outrage; that's their #$%(!@
job!:grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC