Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehlert himself: "Why the Swift Boat Hoax Still Matters!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:22 PM
Original message
Boehlert himself: "Why the Swift Boat Hoax Still Matters!"
Eric Boehlert, author of Lapdogs, posts at Crooks and Liars:

(Eric Boehlert, author of the new book "Lapdogs," writes an exclusive piece for C&L. Hopefully, he will become a regular contributor on the site.)

Sunday's New York Times revisited the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth attacks against Sen. John Kerry and highlighted how Kerry is still working hard to clear his name and knock down any questions that remain about his stellar service in Vietnam. Kerry's not the only one nursing wounds from the Swifty attacks. For lots of people the phrase 'Swift Boat' has become synonymous with 'Florida Recount'; a dreadful, hard-to-relive chapter in campaign history, in which Republicans played bare-knuckle hardball and the press pretty much let them get away with it.

I devote an entire chapter in my new book: "Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush" to the Swift Boat hoax, not only detailing the absurdity of the allegations, but to chronicle how the press walked away from its traditional role as campaign referee and simply threw up its hands, announcing it was impossible to tell which side--Kerry or the Swifties--was telling the truth. That, despite the fact the Swifties stepped forward 35-years after-the-fact and without a single military document to back up their wild claims. (Every U.S. Navy record backed up Kerry's version of events.)

Thanksfully, over months and years the Swifties' most serious charges of faked wounds and bogus medals have proven to be fictitious; a political dirty trick. Yet thanks in large part to the press' initial timidity during those dog days of summer 2004, the Swifties remain lurking today, waiting for the next opportunity to pounce. For instance, Swifty ring leader and chronic fabricator John O'Neill recently sent out a nationwide fund-raising letter on behalf of a Vermont Republican running for the U.S. Senate. Just this week the Associated Press, profiling James Webb and his effort to unseat Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen, noted the issue of military service could become a campaign issue. (Webb was a decorated Marine; Allen never served.) The AP reported, "A top Allen adviser, Christopher J. LaCivita, was the mastermind behind Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a group of Vietnam veterans who made unsubstantiated allegations challenging Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry's record of wartime heroism."

And we now know that right after the 2004 victory Bush's brother Jeb personally thanked the factually-challenged Swifties, gushing in a January 2005 letter, "I simply cannot express in words how much I value their willingness to stand up against John Kerry." ...please click here to read the entire article

permalink11:13:09 AM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. GREAT MESSAGE for Dems - always use the word HOAX after Swiftboat vets
or swiftvets or swifties, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some prefer to refer to them as
SWIFTLIARS. Doesnt leave much room for misinterpretation, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Then there's "smearboaters"
I've been using Swift Liars, but I actually like smearboaters better - wish I'd thought it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. SmearBoaters ...
Hmm ... has a nice ring to it, but Im not sure it quite does it for me. Smear doesn't have quite the snap that LIAR does.
I like to smear a lot of peanut butter on toast in the morning.
Smear ... Hmm..
Nope. LIAR just works better for me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Their full name is Smear Boat Liars for Bush.
(According to me.) Certainly more accurate than Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

Although to "swift boat" is entering the language already as a synonym for "smear," I keep thinking that honest Swift Boat veterans must be pained at that meaning, so I call the phonies who went after Kerry smearboaters, or the full title above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even Boehlert...
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 03:03 PM by orwell
...dances around it. He says the "Republicans played bare-knuckle hardball..." This was not hardball. It was blatant lying. It is one thing to say your opponent is weak or duplicitous, it is quite another to say that 1=2 or 2+2=5. The former is the spin on a "bare-knuckle hardball," the latter is outright lying.

The press needs to say this every time the Swifties are mentioned either individually or as a group. They should be called the Swift Boat Veterans For Lies. At least he names John O'Neill as a chronic fabricator. I wouldn't mention this ahole's name without the word liar, or at least something synonymous attached.

The same should be done with almost everyone from the Bush Regime. They have all been caught bald face lying. They deserve no further benefit of the doubt, waffling, or other minced words. It's about time the press played a little "bare-knuckle hardball" with this current group of knuckleheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. This one got me thinking ..
Isn't just our referring to this as a hoax constitute the same watering down of facts. I mean why are we being so wishy-washy?
A hoax is like walking up to someone getting into their car at a mall parking lot and telling them you just saw someone put a snake in their back window .... hoax,hah,hah.
Accepting millions of dollars in payment to prance around the country, telling outrageous lies which contradict every piece of documented history. Thats no Hoax. Thats a crime. Libel or defamation of character, call it what you will but it is punishable under the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The MSM is determined to distort the facts!
Glad Boehlert addresses this:

...For reporters (like Republicans), the whole controversy was born at the Democratic convention when Kerry, they said, went overboard with his Vietnam references. "Fifty percent of the convention, or more, was about , and his speech was about that," insisted New York Times reporter Adam Nagourney. With all that nostalgia, "There was not, I think it's fair to say, that much talk about what would do as president."

Fact: During his nearly 60-minutes convention address, Kerry made less than five references to his military service. By comparison, he devoted 19 paragraphs of his speech to buttressing national security, nine paragraphs to improving the economy, and six to addressing health insurance woes. But just one month later, journalists, echoing the talking points of Republicans, insisted the convention was all about Vietnam, which then somehow made it okay for partisan who had remained silent for 35 years to suddenly question Kerry's medal-winning service.



Kerry only said the word Vietnam twice in his entire speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I was starting to believe I'd misheard the entire thing.
All that pundit blather about the focus on Vietnam. When I listened to his convention speech what I heard in it was hopefulness, energy, and a positive attitude.

And you know, I still remember the pundit talk right after the speech - about how Kerry'd "hit a home run" and "knocked it out of the park."

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. exactly!
It felt like the Twilight Zone after a couple of days. I watched the speech live, too (who didn't!) and saw and heard the same thing you did. Evidently, the pundits agreed with us - at least on that day. I guess they got their marching orders faxed to them by Rove right away, because two days later, you'd have thought they had watched a different speech!
The same thing happened with the debates, too. btw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Kerry was so incredible in the first debate that they actually
couldn't spin that one. My husband and I watched that one with a group of neighbors. About half way through, one woman between questions, just said "There's no way they can spin this one" sounding almost dazed. After it was over all of us were noticably more excited about the race than when we came in.

(Funny side note - I "found" this debate party on the Kerry site. Shocked that it was in my town, I responded with my husband and my name. It turned out that I actually knew the host and hostess well - their daughter babysat for me years ago and since that debate party my youngest babysits for her old babysitter's child.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Nagourney has been a GOP operative working for the NYT as a reporter for
years - he printed twisted reports against Gore throughout 1999 and 2000, while slobbering over Bush.

He's VERY COZY with Rove - and probably VERY COZY with Jeff Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC