Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Author of NYT tabloid story on Clintons has checkered record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:28 AM
Original message
Author of NYT tabloid story on Clintons has checkered record


http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240005
Author of NYT tabloid story on Clintons has checkered record

Summary: Patrick Healy, the author of a New York Times article purporting to examine the married life of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton, wondered in a 2004 report whether Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John F. Kerry (MA), was "a bit kooky" and openly questioned "what kind of marriage the Kerrys have" while filing other erroneous stories on the Democratic nominee that fueled Republican attacks. By contrast, Healy has let another prominent New Yorker and possible presidential contender, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, escape similar personal probing in three recent stories.

Patrick Healy, the author of a front-page, above-the-fold May 23 New York Times article purporting to examine the married life of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton, wondered in a 2004 report in The Boston Globe whether Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John F. Kerry (MA), was "a bit kooky" and openly questioned "what kind of marriage the Kerrys have" while filing other erroneous stories on the Democratic nominee that fueled Republican attacks. By contrast, Healy has let another prominent New Yorker and possible presidential contender, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, escape similar personal probing in three recent stories.

Healy, in his article, interviewed "some 50 people," conducted "a review of their respective activities," and revived unsubstantiated rumors of an affair between Bill Clinton and a Canadian politician -- rumors that Healy himself appeared to acknowledge are better suited to "the gossip pages." However, Healy has not turned a critical eye on the marriages of Republican presidential hopefuls, or explored how the spouses of Republican candidates may affect their political future. Since April, Healy has written three articles on Giuliani. While two of the articles made mention of the former mayor's divorces, none delved into the matter in any detail, much less subjecting Giuliani to the same level of scrutiny as the Clintons' marriage received in Healy's May 23 article. .......

Take Action!

Contact information:

The New York Times
Byron Calame, NY Times public editor
E-mail:public@nytimes.com
Phone: (212) 556-7652
Address: Public Editor
The New York Times
229 West 43rd St.
New York, NY 10036-3959

New York Times
letters@nytimes.com
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. the liberal press
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I sent him my two cents worth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. It figures....
Damn idiotic bogus tabloid writers!

The are full of pure B.S.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here' s My Letter to the Times:
"Patrick Healy's page one extravaganza on the Clinton marriage was an absurd waste of reporter time and front page space.

Not only was it inappropriate, but it contained no "news" whatsoever. It appears that its only purpose was to refresh the public's recollection of Monica Lewinsky and the impeachment trial and to plant, without documentation, a rumor of a Canadian intrigue.

Didn't the Times get enough Clinton bashing in during its reportage of the impeachment and Whitewater? Before starting a new investigation into a new non-event, wouldn't it be appropriate to apologize for all your false Whitewater coverage?

Why has no similar investigative story been run about Rudy Giuliani or George Bush? Oh, that's right, they are a protected species, they are Republicans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC