Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nadar: Dems self deception re: Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:33 PM
Original message
Nadar: Dems self deception re: Hillary
"Dear Friend,

She sat on the board of Wal-Mart for six years.

She is Rupert Murdoch’s new political buddy and beneficiary of his fund-raising draw.

She voted for Bush’s illegal, immoral, and fabricated war in Iraq.

And she supports NAFTA and GATT-WTO.

She does not challenge the bloated, corruption-ridden, redundant military budget.

She does not challenge hundreds of billions of dollars in corporate welfare - subsidies, giveaways, bailouts...

She does next to nothing against the corporate crime wave sweeping through the inner cities of New York state and around the country - the poor pay more and are defrauded more...

And if the vote were held today, Senator Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee for President in 2008.

And even the most progressive of Democrats would support Clinton in her campaign for the White House.

The philosophers have a word for this – it’s called self-deception.

These Democrats are deceiving themselves into believing that they can support Clinton for President and live with themselves as conscientious human beings.

They cannot.

Self-deception is a major problem affecting conflicts throughout the world – in families, corporations, politicians, and in war zones.

Self deception arises when we deny our own humanity and the humanity of others.

Actions that contradict our own human standards.

And then we seek all kinds of ways to justify these contradictions...

This happened in 2004.

And it is destined to happen again in 2008.

The only way out is for the country to understand that it is in a box of collective self-deception.

And then to get out of the box.

And there is a way out.

See others as human beings.

Not as objects or subjects.

Once we do this, our humanity will not allow us to support pro-war, corporate candidates like Senators Clinton and Joseph Lieberman..."

snip...

http://www.votenader.org/contribute/index.php?cid=100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nader wants money, eh?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. And he can kiss my ass
Ralph Nader is a foolish old man, a spoiler who enables the GOP and takes money from their fatcats.

Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, which is why it really pisses me off when he's right.
Remove Clinton's name if that makes it less offensive. The principle is still the same...and he's right.

Just pisses me off that this idiot had to be the one to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He's saying that crap because he's looking for MONEY
He'd probably tell us the sky is green if that is what he thought people wanted to hear. He'll do anything, so long as he can have a camera pointed at him and play on the national stage.

It's all about RALPH. It's not about the country. His hubris is a tumor on the nation. He needs to go home and shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. When 90% of his money is not from the GOP have him give me a call n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was wondering if Nader would................
....be running again. How much are the neocon/fundies going to give Nader this time around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freexone Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. ugh...
Keeping that fool in the race on makes things worse for Dems.
Good grief...how many bad apples are in this damned basket?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nader is a nonentity.
However, I'm a bit concerned about the Hillary hate festival.

I sincerely hope Al Gore challenges her in a Clash of the Titans and emerges victorious, but what happens if she does win the Democratic nod?

Participating in her annihilation in retrospect will seem like a really bad idea and it should for others unless they plan to bolt and vote third party.

Run, Al. Just run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Locking
Feel free to raise money for third party candidates on someone else's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC