Democrats keep leveling charges at Blackwell they can’t back up

"But Blackwell has a strong counterargument: The rule he wrote simply follows the law. (*gag*) Indeed, it does appear to do that. Critics might more appropriately aim their ire at the GOP-controlled legislature and demand that it change the law. emphasis mine
--shutting down count witnesses due to a fabricated, especially as the FBI denied the claim of "terrorist threat" in one Ohio district.
(Just watch -- I'll lay good odds on the next elections having hundreds of such 'terror alerts' to disenfranchise non-partisan vote-count witnesses!)
--Rebumblan minions (of who most are imported, out-of-state 'operatives') further delaying the long wait time in Democratic districts by challenging votes(many if not most are singled out because of 'profiling', i.e. the color of their skin
--And perhaps most importantly, witness Blackwell's boasts and crowing about his winning the election for Bush!
Which shows, if nothing else, rabid partisanship from an election commissioner no less!

These are only a few of many

They actually have the nerve to offer as proof of their claims the VERY poorly researched (and truthful) 'rebuttal' from Farhad Manjoo on Salon.com! Really now -- is Manjoo the 'Colmes' of Salon? If so, they should keep him silent and 'neutralized' just as Faux does to Colmes!

http://download14.rbn.com/rstone/rstone/download/misc/blackwellfundraisingltr.pdf

*disgusted*

--but let's be fair, it's not just the Neo-CON's alone, it shows willful collusion by 'regular' Republicans who don't necessarily identify with the CON's--
most of whom who, whether they like it or not, are "Brand W" 'pukes.

K & R for the alert to the latest Psyops, certainly not approval!