Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House aide of George Bush/Guilty on 4 counts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 11:45 AM
Original message
White House aide of George Bush/Guilty on 4 counts
Safavian Found Guilty in Lobbyist Trial

By PETE YOST
1. WASHINGTON Jun 20, 2006 (AP)— A jury found former Bush administration official David Safavian guilty Tuesday of covering up his dealings with Republican influence-peddler Jack Abramoff.
Safavian was convicted on four of five felony counts of lying and obstruction. He had resigned from his White House post last year as the federal government's chief procurement officer.
The trial consumed eight days of testimony about Safavian's assistance to Abramoff regarding government-owned real estate and a weeklong golfing excursion the lobbyist organized to the famed St. Andrews golf course in Scotland and London. Safavian went on the trans-Atlantic trip while he was chief of staff at the General Services Administration, and other participants were Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, two Ney aides and Christian Coalition founder Ralph Reed.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2097589
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. MSNBC is running in the background; amazing that I haven't heard
a word about this. Nah, not so amazing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In the world made by
Bushbots this is not important. There is just too much fear to be monged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, this will be remembered as the tipping point
the day of the first real conviction of a Bush staffer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Rumsfeld says under oath, laws don't apply to him
because he was a government employee, I bet you didn't hear this on MSNBC, why we need our
newspapers

Tanker Inquiry Finds Rumsfeld's Attention Was Elsewhere
By R. Jeffrey SmithWashington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 20, 2006; Page A15


The topic was the largest defense procurement scandal in recent decades, and the two investigators for the Pentagon's inspector general in Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's office on April 1, 2005, asked the secretary to raise his hand and swear to tell the truth.
Rumsfeld agreed but complained. "I find it strange," he said to the investigators, on the grounds that as a government official "the laws apply to me" anyway.

It was a bumpy start to an odd interview, as Rumsfeld cited poor memory, loose office procedures, and a general distraction with "the wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan to explain why he was unsure how his department came to nearly squander $30 billion leasing several hundred new tanker aircraft that its own experts had decided were not needed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/19/AR2006061901090.html?referrer=email

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. And the media says nothing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. well, the Washington Post asked for this transcript of Rumsfeld
one year ago under the Freedom of Information Act, so a number of journalists do care and
are trying to give us the "full picture" but look what they are fighting against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What's a newspaper? It aint news until its on the boob-tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. not necessarily
Edited on Tue Jun-20-06 12:53 PM by MissWaverly
the average number of people who watch the nightly news is dropping and I think the age
range is over 60. News has made itself more portable with itunes, podcasts, mp3 files
to reach the entire population and then there is the impact of our blogs. Look at the
Colbert speech at the journalists dinner.

Remember Good Night and Good Luck, they actually searched the papers for news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Like Colbert said at Press Dinner,"This Admin is arranging deck chairs on
the Hindenberg...more so every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I still can't get over Rummie saying laws don't apply to him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC