Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

D.C. Dem incumbants set to invade CT to campaign for Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:33 AM
Original message
D.C. Dem incumbants set to invade CT to campaign for Lieberman
http://www.rollcall.com/issues/51_141/news/13941-1.html?type=pf

SNIP
With Lamont mounting a serious challenge, Senate Democrats are making a point of rallying around Lieberman, with many lawmakers expected to travel to the Nutmeg State in the coming weeks. His Senate Democratic colleagues already have donated more than $49,000 since 2004 to his re-election campaign.

“I disagree with Joe on the war, but there are a lot of things we agree on,” one Democratic Senator close to Lieberman said. The lawmaker, who has clashed with Lieberman in the past, nevertheless said that he will travel to Connecticut in the run-up to the primary to campaign for his colleague.

The Senator also argued that Lieberman is the stronger candidate and that a Lamont win could seriously damage the party’s ability to take control of the Senate. “Joe Lieberman represents our best chance of taking back the majority. I think that if Ned Lamont wins that primary we’re in real danger of losing that seat” in November, the Senator said.

Privately, however, Democrats acknowledge that Lieberman — whose positions on the Iraq war and often close relationship with the Bush administration have rankled many in the party — could force his fellow Senators to choose between backing one of their own and abiding by the wishes of the state’s Democratic voters. Lieberman’s decision to leave the door open to an Independent run has angered many rank-and-file Democratic activists and has added an unwanted wrinkle to Democrats’ long-shot efforts to gain control of the Senate in November.

More...

I'll have to fly my "Don't tread on me" flag out when these clowns come in to help Lieberman.

CT bloggers, prepare for battle!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. How dare they?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think we have Schumer's answer....
"FUCK YOU, CT VOTERS! WE'LL TELL YOU WHO YOU'LL VOTE FOR OR ELSE."

That is one of the most insulting things I've ever seen one group of Democrats do to another. I'm going to pay close attention to exactly WHO shows up on his behalf -- bet on it!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Once again proving that outsiders and new activists are not wanted
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh ho..they have
to get off their fat or skinny backsides and start working for the bush lover in CT!

Way to go lie-man..can't do it yourself. Can't walk around & smooze the shit like you have for 18 years..:nopity: Cry me a fucking river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm all in favor of it . . .
Stand up and be counted, folks. Let's see which side you're on. The answer to campaigning is more campaigning. Sure, nobody in the clubby Senate wants to see a colleague turned out of his office in the primary; too easy to see that happening to yourself. But will the out-of-state campaigners answer what issues they're basing their support for Lieberman on? Because if they don't, then Connecticut voters should just ignore them as being political hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Loserman has the power to assure
that the Dems don't lose this seat even if he is defeated in the primary. All he has to do is announce that he will support the winner of the primary in the general election. If these unnamed Dems are so concerned about losing the seat they will pressure Joementum to drop out now and support Lamont. It's just amazing how out of touch DC Dems are about this situation, even good ones like Boxer who was clueless about it at YK in Las Vegas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC