Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rallied by Bush, Skittish G.O.P. Now Embraces War as Issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:09 PM
Original message
Rallied by Bush, Skittish G.O.P. Now Embraces War as Issue
Just a few weeks ago, some Republicans were openly fretting about the war in Iraq and its effect on their re-election prospects, with particularly vulnerable lawmakers worried that its growing unpopularity was becoming a drag on their campaigns.

But there was little sign of such nervousness on Wednesday as Republican after Republican took to the Senate floor to offer an unambiguous embrace of the Iraq war and to portray Democrats as advocates of an overly hasty withdrawal that would have grave consequences for the security of the United States. Like their counterparts in the House last week, they accused Democrats of espousing "retreat and defeatism."
...
The approach might yet be upended by more problems in Iraq, as Republicans were reminded this week with reports about two American servicemen who were abducted, tortured and apparently killed. Some polls show a majority of Americans continue to think that entering Iraq was a mistake, and pollsters say independent voters are particularly open to the idea of setting some sort of timetable for withdrawal, the very policy Democrats have embraced and Republicans are now fighting.
...
A senior adviser to Mr. Bush said the White House had concluded that it was better to plunge aggressively into the debate on Iraq than to let Democrats play upon clear, public misgivings about the war. "This is going to be a big issue in this election," said the adviser, who was granted anonymity in exchange for agreeing to describe strategic considerations about the war. "Better to shape and fight it — as good and strongly as you can — than to try to run away from it."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22capital.html?hp&ex=1151035200&en=23087ca8c839a956&ei=5094&partner=homepage

So that's the plan for Iraq? Line up against Democrats and the public? ........woohoo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. A senior adviser to Mr. Bush
Edited on Wed Jun-21-06 11:22 PM by The_Casual_Observer
Might that someone be a fat headed worm named karl?

I've been wondering what all this bluster and bravado was about. It's all about a fucking election, not about "our security". Shit on them. This is an ill conceived desperate move by them, it is sure to backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. all they know how to do is campaign - it is always a "political problem"
No concern about real problems or real governing. Just reward the base, and bamboozle the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Some day when this is all sorted out, there will be many regrets
about how political advisers were allowed to make all the policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I hope so, but it's spooky to see the cable clowns pick up the e-z story
They'd much rather ape "cut and run" than have to run down some substance to the issue -even though! how hard is it to get the daily attack count or the death count or a dozen other quick facts?

The cables would so much rather gush about a come-back story.

This story tops the NYT page. The war debate in the Senate was today! - but that coverage shrinks to this insider political process crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I wonder how many times the slogan cut and run was used today--LOTS
that is for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. they embrace war all right
no doubt about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. They care about political power not our troops
How very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. they certainly were gun-ho in their lectures during the Senate debate
today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bring it on.
Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do they mean Cut & Run from the Vietnam draft like most of the ChickenHawk
did - Rove, Buch, & Cheney just to name a few. They are the original cut & run crowd & now they Lie & Die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. This pro-war bluster... "cut and run"... none of it will work...
because the American people are no longer predisposed toward following the GOP's logic. If they continue down this road, with constant negative revelations coming from Iraq (marines were indicted for MURDER today, for Pete's sake!) they will implode by November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. hope you are right. (but seems the sheepy Repug congresscritters
are following).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC