|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LEW (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:09 AM Original message |
CANAMEX HIGHWAY - What am I missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's a corporate, right wing wet dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dunvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Absolutly correct, Warpy...why not (if this is going to happen) by rail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 12:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. The Texas portion is designed with RR tracks in the median. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. It's a way to import goods while bypassing longshoreman territory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 07:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
25. And pollution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dunvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. The highway is officially called NASCO... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Based on the map it looks like high speed rail will be part of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:11 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Now look at this ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unlawflcombatnt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 02:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
23. I completely agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. if someone can come up with at least a trillion dollars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. A Spanish Corporation is building it in Texas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's also an attempt to save the Interstates from truck congestion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. yep-- a real freight rail system for long distance shipping... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. toll authorities are also an excellent opportunity for theft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. and money laundering (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. and get this: the neo cons will protect and close Mex. southern border |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Which border? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-26-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Mexico's southern border |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
14. Welcome to my world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LEW (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I did google this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. If it isn't happening in the beltway they could care less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
18. The biggest union buster ever! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. "Global competativeness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. Don't tell Mitch the Blade, or the Indiana GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
24. Someone has been posting about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
26. I don't consider myself an isolationist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. It's even worse than that. NAFTA, GATT, and the whole alphabet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. Tell me how many wetlands and sensitive ecosystems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Texas environmentalists AND conservatives oppose the plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-27-06 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. It's such a brilliant idea, on so many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC