Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TEDtalks: The other Al Gore speech, and what Tony Robbins really told him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:10 AM
Original message
TEDtalks: The other Al Gore speech, and what Tony Robbins really told him
From Huffington Post:


TEDtalks: The other Al Gore speech, and what Tony Robbins really told him

READ MORE: Google, 2006, New York Times, Al Gore, Supreme Court, Global Warming

You've seen "An Inconvenient Truth" and heard plenty about it - about this documentary that manages to be both lucid and riveting while trailing Al Gore as he travels from city to city warning about climate change. You may even have seen the short portrait of Gore (part 1 - part 2) made by director Spike Jonze before the 2000 election - and inexplicably kept in a drawer by the Democratic leadership until recently.

But once you've heard Gore's powerful message, agreed that climate change is no longer debatable, maybe wondered how different the world would be today had he entered the White House six years ago, and perhaps caught yourself hoping that he might run again, you're left with a question: What can we - individuals - do about the climate crisis?

A partial answer is coming today in the form of the other Al Gore speech: the one he gave last February at the TED conference, where he outlined a 14-points template. Gore gave two speeches at TED2006. The acronym stands for Technology, Entertainment and Design, and TED is considered one of the world's leading events in these fields, attracting every year a high-profile crowd of 1000 innovators and doers to Monterey, California. Gore went on stage the first evening and presented the slide show that is at the center of "An Inconvenient Truth". Three days later, he closed the conference with a second keynote.

This "What can I do" talk, together with those of several other TED speakers, is being released today on the Internet, for free and in full video. It shows both the "old" Gore - lecturing us about global warming with depth of knowledge and intensity - as well as the "new" Gore that many seem to have discovered only recently - funny and passionate and convincingly authentic.

The speech opens with Gore going personal and playing standup comedian for a few minutes (and he is entertaining). Then he sketches a blueprint for personal action in 14 points:

- reduce emissions from your home
- reduce emissions from cars
- be a green consumer
- live a "carbon neutral" life
- make your business carbon neutral
- integrate climate solutions into all your innovations, independently of your sector of activity
- invest sustainably, "in companies and funds that are part of the solution"
- become a catalyst for change, learn, teach others
- raise awareness by promoting "An Inconvenient Truth"
- send someone to Nashville who can learn how to give Gore's slideshow ("I'm going to train a group of people that can then use and remix my slides and my talk in their commmunity")
- become politically active, "speak up, make democracy work"
- urge the US to join the rest of the world's community in capping and trading carbon emissions (the Kyoto treaty)
- help with persuasion campaigns
- let's rebrand global warming (he suggests "climate crisis")




TED's decision to release for the first time the conference talks for free was at least partially inspired by the impact the two Gore speeches had on those attending the Monterey gathering last February. "Gore was a convincing presence at the conference, his speeches stirred debates during and after the event: his passion and persuasion activated people. Attendees basically got a live preview of the movie", says June Cohen, director of TED Media in New York. "We believe in sharing the power of ideas, and it became clear to us that these talks deserve a wider audience". On top of the Al Gore speech, the TEDtalks program (which is fully sponsored by car-maker BMW) is launching with presentations by motivational speaker Tony Robbins, community development leader Majora Carter, Swedish data and development expert Hans Rosling, British education visionary Ken Robinson, and the New York Times' tech correspondent David Pogue.

One of these talks contains another powerful Gore-related moment of truth. At one point during his speech, motivational speaker Tony Robbins asks the audience to raise their hand if they have ever failed to achieve something significant in their lives. All hands go up. So Robbins asks: why did you fail? And starts listing the answers: not enough knowledge; lack of time; not enough money; lack of other resources; wrong boss. "The Supreme Court", says a voice from front row, and it's Al Gore's. The whole room laughs. Robbins too, and walks towards Gore to shake his hand. But then he becomes serious again: "You may not have enough money, you may not have the Supreme Court. But that's not the defining factor. The defining factor is never resources: it's resourcefulness". The audience goes silent, sensing that something is gonna happen. "If you have emotion, something that I have experienced very strongly from you the other night at a level that's as profound as I ever experienced, and if you had communicated with that emotion, I believe you would have ... won!". Easy to guess what goes to many minds in the audience at that moment: Wow! Has Tony Robbins just flatly told Gore the other inconvenient truth?

I may be a bit biased on this, given my ties to TED, but TEDtalks takes conference podcasting to a whole new level. TED is going out of its way to make it as easy as possible for anyone interested to access the speeches, by making them available in five different formats: Flash (on ted.com), VideoEgg (on the TEDblog), MP3 audio and MP4 video podcasts (from iTunes or directly from the TED site), and on GoogleVideo. Adding to that is an automatic transcript generator called PodZinger that allows for keyword searches: put in "carbon dioxide" and it finds the exact spots in Gore's talk where it's referenced - then click and start watching at that point (the search of course only works on the online versions, not on the downloaded files; and while doing a decent job PodZinger, like other automatic speech-to-text software, still has a hard time with some nouns and jargon, so some of the results are only partially helpful. But it's a step forward in video searchability).

The podcasts are being released under a Creative Commons license, allowing them to be redistributed freely for non-commercial use. TED plans to release additional videos at regular intervals: over 40 speakers were featured at this year's conference in Monterey (there is an RSS feed to subscribe to the podcasts). The next TED conference (already sold out) will take place in March 2007.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruno-giussani/tedtalks-the-otheri_b_23867.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended. And I LOVE this passage:
One of these talks contains another powerful Gore-related moment of truth. At one point during his speech, motivational speaker Tony Robbins asks the audience to raise their hand if they have ever failed to achieve something significant in their lives. All hands go up. So Robbins asks: why did you fail? And starts listing the answers: not enough knowledge; lack of time; not enough money; lack of other resources; wrong boss. "The Supreme Court", says a voice from front row, and it's Al Gore's. The whole room laughs. Robbins too, and walks towards Gore to shake his hand. But then he becomes serious again: "You may not have enough money, you may not have the Supreme Court. But that's not the defining factor. The defining factor is never resources: it's resourcefulness". The audience goes silent, sensing that something is gonna happen. "If you have emotion, something that I have experienced very strongly from you the other night at a level that's as profound as I ever experienced, and if you had communicated with that emotion, I believe you would have ... won!". Easy to guess what goes to many minds in the audience at that moment: Wow! Has Tony Robbins just flatly told Gore the other inconvenient truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Except that.. Al Gore did... win!
He got... more votes! Both... nationally and... in Florida! What stopped Gore was not passion, it was... the Supreme Court! And the Supreme Court didn't stop the vote count because Gore lacked passion about his beliefs. They did it BECAUSE Gore is passionate about his beliefs. They didn't want a guy who was passionately committed to liberal ideas in the White House.

Additionally, anybody who was paying attention in 2000 knows (or should know) that Gore's problem wasn't lack of passion - - back in 2000, we were all told he was the guy would lick a toilet to get elected, remember? His passion was a big, ugly turn off. His passion was class warfare for class warfare's sake.

And we were told all that by a much bigger problem than anything Gore did or didn't do: the media. The MSM worked actively to destroy his campaign by painting him a liar, and a completely unethical person. "Passion" is not the opposite of "lie"; one can easily be a passionate liar (look at Hitler - - he lied with a great deal of passion).

The "other" media problem Gore had in 2000 was that the Net was not mature enough to counter the MSM. Gore posted all his speeches on his website (and mentioned his website constantly) and anybody who went to his website could see he was passionate about his beliefs. Very few people did that, however. The blogosphere was non-existent. So people either heard the MSM trash Gore as a vampire, or they saw coverage like this on the network news:

Five sections of footage of Bush waving to a crowd followed by five seconds of footage of Gore waving to a crowd.
Anchor: Today in Iowa, Governor Bush promised to protect social security. In Pennsylvania, Vice President Gore said Bush's plan would cost too much.

Or... they would see Gore on one of the non-news shows he went on relentlessly to try and get around the MSM filter - - and even though he tried to talk about issues, the non-news interviewers wanted to focus on what he ate, what books he read, and whether he was stiff.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, of course. We knew that Al Gore was ALWAYS the "new Al Gore".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Damned right!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Everything you say is exactly right and...
We do need to all learn from our past experiences. Perhaps this exchange between Gore and Robbins has allowed/will allow Al to tap all of his energy/power to motivate. Al was better in 2000 than I could ever hope to be in that impossible, impossible situation. With his brilliance & talent, and now with our increased awareness, what can we do to create and maintain a community of authentic people who can withstand the mud-slinging corporate media; the toxic process of campaigning; and the unethical, illegal maneuverings of the GOP? We can't rest on the belief that we could now solve the problems of the past -- because new problems will arise. How is our resourcefulness? Is Al in the perfect place to run again, win again, and, this time, hold onto that win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. May I venture different explanation?
Edited on Tue Jun-27-06 07:36 PM by lildreamer316
I think Tony may be right, but not as it applies to Gore exclusively. Put the people who voted for Gore (=most of the population) and reapply the statement. If WE had had more passion and intent, WE would not have lost. Gore was our true representative; the country's intent embodied within a person (as far as that can go).
THEN the statement fits, and is aptly applied.
If WE/Gore had been more willing to fight; we would have won. Many people allowed themselves to be lulled into complacency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. YES YES YES. This can't be said enough.
This bullshit that Gore "wasn't passionate enough" back in 2000, and that that's why he "lost" is the one true negative to come out of all his good Inconvenient Truth publicity. Gore was simply robbed by a corrupted Supreme Court that chose to appoint a president rather than count every vote. And that's the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I disagree - Gore won, and his personality is still the same as it was -
people are just beginning to LISTEN without the media distorting his words to fit their preferred storyline.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, I pretty much said that above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Really excited about this!
I'm glad they're podcasting this conference so anyone can view the presentations. I hope more conferences start to do this.

I'll watch some of these presentations when I get home. :-)

I'm really glad for the exchange between Tony Robbins and AG. :D :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Run, Al, Run! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for posting Pirate Smile.
Kicked and recommended for President Gore.:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wish our people would stop taking advice from Repubs
like Tony Robbins. I think this is a bad idead in general
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC