Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone answer this for me (TX mid-decade redistricting)...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:10 PM
Original message
Can someone answer this for me (TX mid-decade redistricting)...
...why was the mid-decade redistricting allowed at all? AS I understand it, after the 2000 census, the Texas legislature declined to redistrict and it was left to the courts to redistrict.

How then can they decide mid-decade to redistrict again? How is this not against the Constitution?

(PS: I know there's an answer to this, or it would have been brought up in court. I just have not heard anyone address it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. The States Legislature can do whatever they want
Which means that hey, if Dems win the California Governorship this year, why don't they do a little redistricting here for a few more gains in 08?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. It happened because Tom DeLay wanted it to happen
There was never any secret about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans tooks control of the Texas state legislature in 2002
That's what allowed the opportunity and DeLay made sure they took it.

You'll see much more emphasis on state legislatures as a result of the SCOTUS ruling. We did very well in that regard in 2004. Prior to that the Republicans had been making inroads every year. Last I checked it was basically even, something like 19 or 20 states apiece with one party having control of both chambers of a state legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC