Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

question re; estate tax and 401(k)s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:25 PM
Original message
question re; estate tax and 401(k)s
You may not know it but if you leave your heirs money in a 401(k) they pay tax on it as regular income. this often means it is taxes at the highest rate possible as it is an increase in their income. This money is also subject to the estate tax, assuming you have an estate of sufficient size.

My question is how many people leave 401(k) money in their estate?
How much money on average is left in those estates that do contain 401(k)s?
Any ideas on where I might look to find these out?



I am writing a letter to the editor in hopes of making Hastert look like the unfair tax cheat he is.
My congress critter Denny has not paid any tax on his $2 million profit as he has reinvest it in land, and if his heirs get it on his death they will pay no income tax on it ever! They may have to pay an estate tax if we can get ride of these clowns before they get rid of more of the obligations of the rich to society.
Thanks in advance for you help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. That happened in my family, and we got badly screwed.
It was NOT a large estate, and ALL of the non-retirement account money got eaten up by estate taxes and lawyer fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think it's possible to answer your questions
Here's the way I figure it, based on a decade of experience as a probate attorney: most folks with a 401(k) or IRA have a beneficiary named on the account, so it passes outside of probate and thus would not appear on an estate inventory filed with the court. In addition, 98% of estates are below the level where the executor has to file an estate tax return, which is pretty much the only other place where there would be a written record of all of the estate assets.

So theoretically it's possible to answer your question, but it would require selecting a large enough random sample of recently deceased people, and then contacting their families to see if there was a 401(k), and all your other questions.

Still, your points are valid, and I think they would be just as strong even without the figures you seek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know few would pay both estate and income taxes on 401(k)s
that's kind of my point, the tax would likely be much higher on 401(k)s then on estate taxes since the estate tax has a $million + standard deduction off net value. Should the estate tax cut currently being pushed by Hastert go into effect his children's tax on the net profit on his land would be zero.
Is it not true that whether or not the funds go through probate the recipient of it is taxed as regular income? p.s. not trying to make a point here just askin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, you're correct
When the 401(k) funds are withdrawn the recipient pays income taxes as you said. My point was that in my opinion you don't need to cite actual numbers in order to make your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. The logic of that is that it was income not taxed as income during the
lifetime of the person's who has left the 401k behind.

I'm not convinced yet that there's something unfair going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. of course it has not been taxed that is the point nor has the cap gains
been taxed in Hastert's situation. In fact most of the money in estates in unrealized capital gains income. This is the central lie in the GOP argument.

Also the 401(k) money IS taxed, unrealized capiatla gains not taxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But when you put your income into a real estate investment, you don't
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 10:03 AM by 1932
get to deduct the principle you pay from your earned income that year in order to reduce your taxable income. That money for the investment came from money that was more likely than not taxed as earned (or unearned) income.

The 401k principle was used at one point to reduce your earned income, and you got a big tax break on it, so taxing it as income to your heirs is just a way to make sure that the 401k tax break (which was not designed to totally escape income tax, but is designed to push into the future the point when the principle is taxed as earned income) doesn't turn into a mechanism for completely escaping tax.

And not getting a cap gains hit if you flip real estate into a similar or more expensive property -- that's another issue. There is some logic to that too. Without it, land would have to increase in value by 30% every time you sold it if you didn't want to see your business shrink. Without that break, there probably be no commerical real estate business. People would never sell property.

I might be missing something, so please keep trying to explain your concern to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Estate tax only refers to
after the first 2 million - does it affect you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Is'nt there a bill going thru congress to exempt all estates under 5 Mill
Atleast that is what I recall...anybody know about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC