Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: For Democrats, Power to Remap Congressional Districts Is Tricky Tool

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:22 AM
Original message
LAT: For Democrats, Power to Remap Congressional Districts Is Tricky Tool
SUPREME COURT RULINGS
For Democrats, Power to Remap Is a Tricky Tool
The high court decision gives the party a chance to gain House seats. But redrawing districts may alienate minorities or stir other tensions.
By Peter Wallsten, Times Staff Writer
June 29, 2006

.... the Voting Rights Act, which was changed in the 1980s to require that more districts be drawn to elect minority lawmakers, also has led to a so-called whitening of surrounding districts that, in effect, guarantees the election of greater numbers of Republicans. An element of Wednesday's high court ruling faulted the Texas plan for diluting Latino voting power in one district.

Creating more Democratic seats could require shifting African American voters from districts designed to elect black lawmakers into neighboring districts more likely to elect a white candidate. In California and New York, and across the South, Democrats who want to redraw the maps would be forced to confront black leaders who have long advocated electing minorities to Congress even if it means handing the majority to the GOP.

In the early 1990s, Republicans made gains — leading to their 1994 takeover of the House — after GOP lawmakers across the country teamed up with civil rights leaders to draw maps creating more minority seats than had been proposed by the Democrats, who held power in many places at the time.

Wednesday's ruling forces Democrats to face that uncomfortable political reality once again.

"It requires a very solid Democratic coalition, with white Democrats and black Democrats together, to be willing to strike a bargain where both sides take some hits in hopes of capturing more seats," said David Epstein, a Columbia University political scientist and co-editor of a forthcoming book on the Voting Rights Act. "There's a great tension between the emotional tradition of voting rights politics on the one hand and the more strategic gerrymandering calculus on the other."...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-states29jun29,0,587928.story?coll=la-home-nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. What's good for the goose is good for the gander
Win elections, and do the exact same thing to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here! Here! Can't win elections playing by the rules when your opponent ..
...doesn't!

I don't like it; this having to stoop to their level, but if this is what it takes, then we should go for it otherwise America is doomed, and this is about rescuing her from those rightwing-nuts determined to destroy the greatest democracy the world has ever known.

You need to break eggs to make an omelet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shouldn't the LATimes be under investigation, too?
I mean, they leaked the same info that the NY Times did . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They did. Maybe the Bushies are taking on media one at a time --
CBS, NYT....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. One "liberal media" at a time . . .
funny how the NYTimes sat on its ass when it came to things which might have sunk Bush in 04 . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. So didn't the SC rule that we can pretty much redistrict whenever we want?
If the Dems want more seats, can't they just do that now in every State that flipped Democratic in 04?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sounds like it's difficult not to imperil some minority Dem seats? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It'd take away a couple votes probably from several democrats
But doing it in enough states to give us the majority would still keep those Dems winning with significant margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. My heart wants districts drawn as close to geographic reality as possible
My head wants them drawn so wildly gerrymandered that we never lose another election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC