|
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 10:37 AM by welshTerrier2
every prominent Democrat and almost all republicans are pushing this exact position ... some point out that it's not just "stay the course" ... that's fair because some think transitioning from an all military focus to the diplomat front will change things ... it won't ...
at least not while the US remains in occupation ... if you were sitting in Tehran, you'd be a fool not to realize the Americans' days in Iraq are numbered ... whether it's 6 months or a year or two or three, all you need to do is wait ... they're in no hurry while they watch US prestige being battered on a daily basis ... they're in no hurry as the US is so mired down in Iraq that they can't threaten Iran ... they're in no hurry while the US pours more blood and treasure into the great sink hole in Iraq ...
while we remain in occupation, WE HAVE NOTHING TO NEGOTIATE WITH ... if you're one of those "let's try diplomacy" people, you need to push FIRST for US withdrawal from Iraq ... then we can negotiate with "Iraq's neighbors" ...
i expect these boneheaded hawkish policies from the republicans; the great tragedy is that virtually every prominent Democrat, certainly all prominent likely 2008 candidates, support MORE OCCUPATION ... with no real opposition, bush is going to drag this out until he leaves office ... it is our job to stop him and stop him NOW!
great post, UP ... welcome aboard ... recommended!!
|