|
Actually, the war on Christmas began not with anything I said or did, but with the indignation of some rich, powerful folks in the right-wing media elite, who became indignant at the prospect of being wished "Happy Holidays" rather than a "Merry Christmas." (More accurately, they perceived that this was an issue that they could fabricate to energize their base for political purposes). Which is, in any event, beside the point. What I am driving at is that, when we (lefties) respond to silly charges such as the "War on Christmas," we do so with appeals to reason, with rational argumentation. Christians specifically deny that reason should be the arbiter of truth, however, so our appeals inevitably fall on deaf ears. For this reason, I've suggested a different tactic, i.e. ridicule and sarcasm. Most Christians believe the silly things they do because these beliefs are customary and respectable. Ridicule has the effect--I hope--of exposing the truth that a belief in the supernatural (to put it another way, in magic) is ridiculous.
Insofar as the question of toleration is concerned, I am using the term to denote the position most liberals take with regard to religion: that it is a purely private matter and, as such, we should not hold it up to ridicule, but should accord it the same respect we would any other sincerely held belief. I question whether this is still useful, because American Christians have themselves abandoned the tolerance that once characterized their thoughts and actions, and because it has become evident that these beliefs are no longer simply a private matter. I am not suggesting the creation of an atheistic orthodoxy sanctioned by the state, but that we should work to create a culture wherein belief in Jehovah becomes as unfashionable as believing that it is OK to litter, that it should be up to the individual whether or not to wear a safety belt, or that smoking is harmless. My view of the new American Christian orthodoxy is borrowed from Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
As far as I understand it, Christians believe that, so long as a murderer sincerely recites the mystical formula "I accept Jesus Christ into my heart as my Lord and savior," he is saved. Maybe you belong to some sect wherein this is not true, but as far as I understand it, American Christian orthodoxy holds that no one is beyond redemption. I think that's absurd, but it is a theologically "correct" statement of the position of most Christians. If you have evidence to the contrary, I'd like to see it.
Actually, no, sorry, Christians don't believe in physics. Perhaps they do believe in civil engineering (a subject that is, at least tangentially, mentioned in the Bible). Modern physics suggests a cosmology that is rejected by Christians. Anyway, you may believe in these things, but the people who claim to speak for Christians don't. According to "A Manifesto for the Christian Church, "We affirm that the Bible is not only God's statements to us regarding religion, salvation, eternity, and righteousness, but also the final measurement and depository of certain fundamental facts of reality and basic principles that God wants all mankind to know in the spheres of law, economics, business, education, arts and communication, medicine, psychology and science." I would praise you for rejecting this statement, but, before rejecting it, you should know that the 107 learned church fathers who signed onto it would say that to do so would place your immortal soul in danger.
I don't think Christians need to be reeducated, because it would seem that many have not been educated in the first place. My suggestion was to use ridicule and sarcasm, not to round people up and put them into camps. Indeed, I think that would be counterproductive, as Christians seem to need persecution to reinforce their own in-group/out-group dynamic--in the absence of persecution, they feel the need to invent persecution, and make even more ridiculous claims in so doing. I cannot imagine how silly they would get if faced with actual persecution.
|