Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What We Wanted to Tell You About Iran (Flynt Leverett re: redacted Op-Ed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 11:56 PM
Original message
What We Wanted to Tell You About Iran (Flynt Leverett re: redacted Op-Ed)
(This is from the NY Times Opinion Page, regarding his redacted Op-Ed in the same issue at the link below. He was also interviewed today on NPR regarding this Op-Ed at this link: <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6665735>

AND! He reveled in the NPR interview (link above) that all of this information, including the redacted parts, are in a 34 page paper that he wrote and published for "The Century Foundation" a few weeks ago. It's available at this link: <http://www.tcf.org/list.asp?type=PB&pubid=595>

or directly at this link: <http://www.tcf.org/publications/internationalaffairs/leverett_diplomatic.pdf>

Also at this NY Times link below are several more article links in the sidebar, from other major publications, with more of the missing info too.)


What We Wanted to Tell You About Iran


By FLYNT LEVERETT and HILLARY MANN
Published: December 22, 2006

HERE is the redacted version of a draft Op-Ed article we wrote for The Times, as blacked out by the Central Intelligence Agency’s Publication Review Board after the White House intervened in the normal prepublication review process and demanded substantial deletions. Agency officials told us that they had concluded on their own that the original draft included no classified material, but that they had to bow to the White House.

Indeed, the deleted portions of the original draft reveal no classified material. These passages go into aspects of American-Iranian relations during the Bush administration’s first term that have been publicly discussed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; former Secretary of State Colin Powell; former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage; a former State Department policy planning director, Richard Haass; and a former special envoy to Afghanistan, James Dobbins.

These aspects have been extensively reported in the news media, and one of us, Mr. Leverett, has written about them in The Times and other publications with the explicit permission of the review board. We provided the following citations to the board to demonstrate that all of the material the White House objected to is already in the public domain. Unfortunately, to make sense of much of our Op-Ed article, readers will have to read the citations for themselves. (See links at left.)

The decisions of the C.I.A. and the White House took us by surprise. Since leaving government service three and a half years ago, Mr. Leverett has put more than 20 articles through the C.I.A.’s prepublication review process and the Publication Review Board has never changed a word or asked the White House for permission to clear these articles....

(more at link) <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/opinion/22precede.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I read that earlier today...
So much of it is blacked out. If I can put on my tinfoil for a moment, I wonder if the document leaked to the ACLU might have been the uncensored version of it?

"But Tehran was profoundly disappointed with the United States response. After the 9/11 attacks, xxx xxx xx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xx set the stage for a November 2001 meeting between Secretary of State Colin Powell and the foreign ministers of Afghanistan’s six neighbors and Russia. xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Iran went along, working with the United States to eliminate the Taliban and establish a post-Taliban political order in Afghanistan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Do you have a link to it? I'm not finding it at the ACLU website...
...though there is other good reading there too: <http://www.aclu.org/newsroom/index.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wow. Kind of drives home the word 'stupid' as exhibited by the CIA.
Do we get more news nowadays, or are they just incredibly dumb and inept? This is scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Leverett places the blame squarely on the White House, as they took this...
...back to the CIA and told them to redact the info. This has nothing to do with National Security, according to Leverett, it's just pure politics by the White House.

He explains it well in the NPR interview: <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6665735>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I guess I resent the fact that the wh tells the CIA to jump, and they
say how high. I know they're federal employees, but if something is absolutely wrong, I wish someone would say something. Harkens back to those young fearless soldiers who are involved in the redress issue. Where are the stones?

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/12/21/18339390.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. One wonders...........
If the CIA is incredibly stupid, or whether they are simply testing the waters to see how far they can go without causing a crowd with pitchforks to appear on the white house and/or the Pentagon lawn(s).

It comes from having a suspicious mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wouldn't blame the CIA for this one, Leverett says that the White House...
...took this back to the CIA and requested they redact certain bits of already the public domain info, according to what he said in his NPR interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC