4. Godsdammit, she went to the money issue, and asked him twice, when he was going to bow out...
of the race. Then she mentioned the camera angle during the debate about him being on a stool! What the fuck is this shit, now I know why I ignore the M$M altogether, I get my news from the internet and Stewart/Colbert.
5. Yeah, if she wants to talk about the money issue which is a problem for
us citizens because we may not be able to get the best candidate only the one who can buy the nomination, she should discuss with him campaign reform which opens the process to others, not just the big money people.
We don't need this long of time to campaign and get the word out with all of the technology and media we now have. It can be shorter as in europe.
They could find a better funding method where more people could be involved.
The candidate who can buy the most TV commercials and distort the facts about the others wins. People base their votes purely by what they hear and see in the commercials. If it didn't work, they wouldn't do it.
It's just too much trouble to google an incumbents voting record.
8. And the media perpetuates that type of campaign. They grab the ones
with the money and exposure and run with it because those candidates bow the almighty media. Those such as Kucinich are dissed and sluffed off. It is all a big money game; all corporate.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.