Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impeachment Sells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:01 AM
Original message
Impeachment Sells
"I have a choice. I can either stand by and lead my constituents to believe I do not care that the president apparently no longer believes he is bound by any law or code of decency. Or I can act." -- U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers

The latest version of the lengthy report on Bush and Cheney's crimes produced by John Conyers' staff on the House Judiciary Committee includes a foreword by former Congresswoman Liz Holtzman which ends thus:

"This pattern of immunity for presidents must stop. Impeaching President Bush for lying to get us into a war will not only protect us from him, but also send an unmistakable message to future presidents: never again."

I'm sure Conyers likes that foreword, because he put it in there and it undoubtedly helps to sell books. Impeachment sells, and some people will do anything that sells, even faking decency. Some of the best paid prostitutes probably impersonate virgins.

"We can fire Bush!" Conyers likes to shout at rallies, later explaining that he simply means we can sit on our hands for two years until Bush's term ends. Conyers is refusing to even begin impeachment hearings, even against Cheney, even against Gonzales. He's refusing even to meet with the author of his book's foreword to talk about it. He's refusing even to meet with 400 of his constituents gathered to discuss it.

On May 29th, Conyers arrived early at a town hall meeting in Detroit that he had agreed to participate in. He left before it began, and never returned. He had, at the last minute, scheduled another public forum for the same time, about gas prices. The crowd at that one was reportedly much smaller and included a number of people who insisted on talking about impeachment.

Conyers' only legitimate excuse for not moving on impeachment would be if he were moving on criminal indictments. His report begins by listing numerous violations of law committed by Bush and Cheney. But Holtzman's short foreword argues for the advantages of impeachment over indictment. I find her case persuasive, and so apparently does some portion of John Conyers.

The question facing the world right now is how to send the rest of John Conyers an unmistakable message. An activist named Gordon Bennett sent me one idea:

"I am planning," he wrote of Conyers' book, "to tear out one page at a time, maybe highlight a key statement, and send it to his Detroit office with a short message pasted to the page from his book, something like,

"Congressman Conyers--
"WHY WASTE ALL THIS EXCELLENT RESEARCH? LET'S GET ON WITH IT!
"or,
"YOU'VE MADE THE CASE IN PRINT. PLEASE MAKE IT ON THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE!"

Anyone interested in joining in Bennett's effort can find Conyers' report for free at http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/constitutionincrisis or purchase it at all the usual online bookstores. Mail your page a day to
Chairman John Conyers
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
or
669 Federal Building
231 W. Lafayette
Detroit, MI 48226

Or, here's a better idea. Fax it each day to (202) 225-0072 or (313) 226-2085.

There is a portion of John Conyers that is absolutely golden, that means to do absolutely right by us and our descendants. But that is precisely why we are so reluctant to hold Conyers to account. We're willing to keep moaning about Bush and Cheney. We'll even denounce Nancy Pelosi for her efforts to pressure Conyers not to impeach. But the fate of this nation and all the nations it impacts around the world is too big a matter to allow our friendship and admiration for John Conyers to block us from demanding - and I mean DEMANDING - that he live up to his oath of office.

Conyers pushed this issue when his party was in the minority. His staff produced a brilliant report. But those facts make his failure to act less, not more, excusable. And let's be clear, after five months in the majority, Conyers is failing to act, not waiting to act. No more evidence is needed. No better evidence than what we possess for several offenses is even conceivable. And no investigations are going to progress much further, now that the White House has made clear that it is going to simply ignore subpoenas (actually, Cheney announced that before the elections, but who's counting).

Nor can Conyers be said to be waiting for his colleagues to gather together the numbers to guarantee passage of Articles of Impeachment. Those numbers will follow impeachment proceedings, not precede them. But Congress Members will only follow where their most senior and respected members lead. If no one leads, nothing will happen - except the ongoing commission of the sort of crimes chronicled so pointlessly and tragically in Conyers' report. The list of crimes is a smorgasbord of impeachment options. If the war is too tough a sell within Congress, Conyers can proceed with the spying, the signing statements, detentions, torture, Katrina, elections. He only needs to pick one in order to do what is needed. Not to act is to be complicit in all of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. we know Conyers can talk the talk. But can he walk the walk? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, David. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. David, by chance are you possibly becoming "disillusioned"?
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 12:36 AM by Decruiter
Can't really say I didn't see it coming, umm maybe back in September, about the time of the big protest in DC on the Mall.

So what now David? If Conyer's won't stand up and do what he promised, who is left? Oh yeah,, right, us. Okay, now what?

We've marched, we've written letters, we've campaigned, marched the halls of Congress, been arrested and petitioned ourselves to death.

NOW WHAT?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Declaration of Independence
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. We've pushed so hard, for so long...
now it's time to push harder, because the damn stone is budging.


:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe We Should Push To Impeach Pelosi First
Since Nancy is the official blockage in the system.

Then we can get Gonzales, Cheney, and the little W himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Sounds like a plan I can support
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. What is Conyers' motivation for not acting?
My thought has always been that the main motivation is loyalty to his House leader, whose motivation in turn would appear to be political calculation.

But it really does confuse the hell out of me. I certainly never expected this from him, and I can't explain it. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. It's Called an End Run in Football, Isn't It?
Conyers is publicly informing Pelosi that the natives are getting restless, and if she wants to be chief of the reservation, she better get on her horse and lead a charge. This way, EVERYNODY knows the same thing. It is smart. Conyers is a disciplined member of the House, but discipline will only get you so far....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. YES!!!
Excellent as usual, David. You should run for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. *** IMPEACH CONYERS ***
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. For What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. There's a sarcasm icon
What the hell, we've seen Pelosi called up for impeachment here based on her lack of agressiveness, I figured it was no more ridiculous to call out Conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Conyers Is Doing His Job, Pelosi Isn't n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not according to this article
"We'll even denounce Nancy Pelosi for her efforts to pressure Conyers not to impeach. But the fate of this nation and all the nations it impacts around the world is too big a matter to allow our friendship and admiration for John Conyers to block us from demanding - and I mean DEMANDING - that he live up to his oath of office."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. This much is clear: Although we don't know the alliances of all the dc dems (which team
they are playing for), I believe Conyers is looking out for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC