|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:12 AM Original message |
Ned Lamont hedges his bet on Obama and Dodd. Ned Rocks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. looks like Ned goes 0-2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep..way to have Edwards back. Obama did not stand up for Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I'm glad you know who Ned should support better than Ned knows himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Lamont's blogger, Tim Tagaris on John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. So he supports Obama who did NOTHING and Dodd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. His political instincts are sooooo finely tuned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Way to throw Ned under the bus!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. And to think all the nedheads were trashing Obama all this time. crow anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Obama didn't stand up for Lamont. Lamont has clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Read post #7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
9. I must have missed the part where Obama came out to campaign for Lamont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-29-07 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. Good for Ned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 03:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC