Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ned Lamont hedges his bet on Obama and Dodd. Ned Rocks!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 10:12 AM
Original message
Ned Lamont hedges his bet on Obama and Dodd. Ned Rocks!
--snip---

Speaking to teenagers in the Greenwich YMCA's Leadership Club, Lamont said: "Barack Obama and Sen. Dodd are going to lead the Democratic Party to victory in November 2008."

Lamont 's crystal ball shows Obama as president and Dodd as vice president.


http://www.greenwichcitizen.com/localnews/ci_6257633


Ned has a sharp mind and makes a fine choice. Go Ned! :)

:bounce: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. looks like Ned goes 0-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep..way to have Edwards back. Obama did not stand up for Lamont
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm glad you know who Ned should support better than Ned knows himself.
Shall we all tell you who to vote for also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Lamont's blogger, Tim Tagaris on John Edwards.
Senator Edwards

Basically, John Edwards called us up and said he was coming to Connecticut in the days after the primary. There wasn't really even an invitation (to the best of my knowledge). In his speech, he never mentioned Joe Lieberman. When pressed by bloggers about coming back to Connecticut, he said he would. When we asked him directly, he declined.

Update <2006-11-14 16:16:6 by ttagaris>: There are a few comments about Senator Edwards and his role in the days immediately following the primary. He was in town, he did say Joe shouldn't run, and he did have a $250 a person fundraiser for Ned. All that is terrific, and was much appreciated. But here's the deal from my perspective as the online guy w/ Ned's campaign -- take it for what it's worth: in the days following the primary '08ers (and a few others) couldn't get their press releases/$5,000 checks out the door quick enough. Call me a cynic, but most of it had to do with the amount of online support we had received and their reaching out to you through Ned. It just is what it is.

When the spotlight wore with time and more races claimed a share of the attention, there were a few people who stuck around and actually held Joe's feet to the fire on Iraq and other issues ... Senator Edwards just wasn't one of them. I'm sorry. I wish he was, but he wasn't.



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/14/122820/27


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. So he supports Obama who did NOTHING and Dodd
They both campaigned FOR Lieberman first.

Sick.

Edwards showed up and delivered, Taggarris is now running two losing campaigns. Asshole. He didn't do much for Lamont's online prescence for being his online director. Lamont didnt even have a MySpace, a fan had to start one cause the official one was so lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. His political instincts are sooooo finely tuned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Way to throw Ned under the bus!!!
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. And to think all the nedheads were trashing Obama all this time. crow anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Obama didn't stand up for Lamont. Lamont has clearly
Been hanging out with Dodd too long, he buys their bullshit

Edwards went out and campaigned with Lamont .

I wont be supporting Lamont again . Loser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Read post #7
Not much of a statement of support for Edwards from Lamont's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. I must have missed the part where Obama came out to campaign for Lamont.
And not travel to every damn state here in New England and coincidentally skip Connecticut.

Oh but he did write that letter rallying the masses for Ned Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good for Ned
This shows that he's making his decision based on who he thinks is best to lead the country, not based on some cynical tit-for-tat where he supports those who nominally supported him even if they're not the best for the job. That's the kind of integrity that made me support him in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC