|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:27 PM Original message |
I don't care if they don't have the votes ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. They'd get the votes if they started impeachment hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. shouldn't we test that theory first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Oh yeah, cuz all of those issue are EXACTLY equivalent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. we can uncover evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Impeachment hearings will focus attention, draw MSM coverage and put pressure on the Rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Yep, when really they're failing by not doing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. but as things stand right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. instead of trying to break a filibuster, they should start impeachment against Gonzo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Now that I can agree with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Holy shit, we agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I completely disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. "Fear of Failing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. How would a filibuster be a test? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. But we HAVE the evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miceelf (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Indeed they might: It's a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. Agreed. Pre-counting votes is, like the issues of "60 votes needed", a lazy way out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. You understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC