|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:11 PM Original message |
"An NSA program" and "The program the president approved" -- Why are they being so cagey? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. because they used it to tap into Kerry's campaign in 2004 and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I can completely believe that, but they've already admitted the program existed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. You aren't supposed to get it, we are supposed to scratch our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. That could be it, too -- just trying to confuse in the public sphere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Does Tony Have National Security Clearance?.......nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rooney (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I just don't get it either! I don't think there was any mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Good question... I'm not sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Gonzo refused to answer the "Yes" or "No" question to this that Schumer asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because it was called TSP after the fact as a propaganda tool? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Ooh, there's an idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. That Gonzales did whenever it was referred to UNTIL THIS WEEK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. So let's say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Oh oh oh wait.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Something like that, yes. Obviously if they weren't obfuscating, we'd know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveAmPatriot (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. CNN is spinning this story big time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
14. An exchange with Feinstein from Feb. 6, 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. An exhange with Schumer, also Feb. 6, 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. Slimy, but effective (enough?) word parsing argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC