|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:45 AM Original message |
Fox News HITS Elizabeth: "how can you not admire a woman in her position who isn't perfectly thin" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. words fail me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. It's FOX whadda ya expect? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. Meow!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Should Fox News really stoop to this level considering what they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ahh, only if delivered in her gravel voice.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Susan is as shallow as the morning mist on my windshield. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Worse? She should be forced to watch videos of herself for a few hours. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
5. It's a hit piece for the Clinton campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Felinity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
6. How rude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. do you think pickles is thin? she is, however, definitely on something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Felinity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No, I should have used the sarcasm smilie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. just checking!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
52. It's why we call her Pickles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. This is no surprise-they are all going to try to pile on Edwards and bury him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellen Forradalom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
8. Susan fucking Estrich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. The same exact phrase went through my mind when I read that piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benny05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. isn't She the one who ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. wait...I thought Dukakkis lost because he was too liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
43. He lost because he was a poor candidate with poor help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 07:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
72. yep, she blew a 15 point lead and turned into a near double digit loss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
11. Hmm. This looks perfectly sincere to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. did you catch-- "obvious weaknesses--not perfectly thin"???? if you don't understand the rudeness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The entire piece is an attack on Elizabeth for attacking Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Felinity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Do these pants make me look fat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. How I admire Tony Snow for not being perfectly bald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. Worst Person nominee! I am sure Keith's people read Du. C'mon KO! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. WHAAAAT? Said like a true moran by Susan Estrich - the Carol Channing of politics. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. hey!! I LIKE carol channing!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Yeah, actually I do, too - but in the context of a musical like "Mame," not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
64. Carol Channing actually HAS a brain n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maggie_May (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't know guys I would take this as a compliment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. yeah, that's the way I'd take it - saying she has guts to be real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. except you have to read it in context--"obvious weakness--not perfectly thin." plus, the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maggie_May (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Read post 39 it will explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. two points here-- why discuss her weight at all? second, when it comes right after the phrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. exactly, and thirdly, the whole piece is an attack on Elizabeth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maggie_May (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. I think she was making a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. what does her book about hillary have to do with her comment about elizabeth's weight? ZERO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maggie_May (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Just wanted to point out that she is a Hillary lover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. you STILL don't understand that sentence, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. A compliment? She said it's an "obvious weakness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine Took (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
23. Estrich is an ugly person - inside and outside. Ugh - revolting!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. Estrich evidently doesnt understand the role that some of the drugs prescibed after a bout of cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrary1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
28. I have read that sentence 3 times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheWhoMustBeObeyed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I took it as a reference to Elizabeth's inoperable cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:57 AM Response to Reply #33 |
74. I took it as a reference to being a political wife, in the public eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. Married to a "hottie" like John Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
32. I detest Susan Estrich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. that is why it isn't right to blame the Clinton campaign for what one supporter says, so I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. I know, I was more referring to a tangent thread that sprung up in relation to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. haha, that's ok, I was just reiterating my point to make sure it was understood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
36. Because Hillary is model-thin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RubyDuby in GA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
38. Um...Hillary isn't exactly supermodel thin herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
40. I hate to say "I told you so but I told you so" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. Oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
67. the book, "The Case for Hillary Clinton" that she wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
44. Susan Estrich is an idiot. She has been giving us this type of remarks for more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
47. Last time I saw her mug on tv, Estrich was hardly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
48. Someone buy Susan Estrich a freakin' mirror!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
54. Susan Estrich is not a Clinton supporter. She is a Faux media whore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. She wrote: "The Case for Hillary Clinton" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Have you read it? It's all gossip and innuendo and "insider" secrets to prove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
55. Elizabeth is comfortable in her own skin. I find that sexy. Susan's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:03 AM Response to Reply #55 |
75. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Physical features means little when there is no intelligence, no heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
58. I really hope Ms. Estrich no longer calls or considers her a feminist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
61. tacky commentary from Fox Noise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
62. Fox News.One of Hillary's biggest supporters! I'll bet Rupert is proud of his girl now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
63. Estrich is obviously every man's dream... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
65. I expect nothing better (but possibly worse) from Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
66. Wow, it's like they're attacking her for not dying of cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LBJDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
68. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
69. This is what we are fighting against. We need change, not more of Susan Estrich and her cronies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
70. Hillarites should denounce Estrich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
71. OMG!!!! Elizabeth is beautiful and now I am pissed off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorekerrydreamticket (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
73. The politics of personal destruction.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC