|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:39 AM Original message |
Edwards Rails Against Lobbyists...and Hillary (who he accuses of defending a lobbyist-driven system) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. Did he actually say her name? That'd be something different from him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Hey now...Don't lump Obama in with your "girl" and her celebration of "the system"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Obama's giving back all his lobbyist money? Wow, does he know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He didn't quit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. So, he ran for another term? Did he win or lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Leiberman did - and the laws in NC allow it (some states don't) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Yeah, I know you can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. That was the point I was making - he had to make a choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Yeah, usually he gets his wife to do the badmouthing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Ouch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm confused... why aren't union lobbyists lobbyists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Unlike SOME people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Which proves the poster's point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Oh, I see. So when he opposes lobbyists, it's only the lobbyists he opposes that he opposes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Yeah, that's why he ran with John Kerry...because he supported Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asha (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. fed lobby money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. Then why hasn't he given back the entire $13,500 he took from Lobbyists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Even Howard Wolfson's response to Edwards reeks of poll testing--like one of Bush's backdrops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yeah, it has nothing to do with the fact that the corporate media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Wolfson's a smarmy schmuck as usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. They changed the headline on that article -- interesting . .. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. R&K for Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
23. From OpenSecrets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC